Variation in morphological traits of a selection of Indonesian winged bean accessions (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus) and its analysis to assess genetic diversity among accessions

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

IZMI YULIANAH
BUDI WALUYO
SUMERU ASHARI
KUSWANTO

Abstract

Abstract. Yulianah I, Waluyo B, Ashari S, Kuswanto. 2020. Variation in morphological traits of a selection of Indonesian winged bean accessions (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus) and its analysis to assess genetic diversity among accessions. Biodiversitas 21: 2991-3000. In Indonesia, winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC.) is a traditional vegetable crop grown mainly for its edible green pods. Plant breeding programs aim to produce cultivars with high production and good nutritional qualities. The objective of this present study was to assess genetic diversity among 21 selected Indonesian winged bean lines based on observation of morphological characters. This was the first step in determining an appropriate breeding program for the development of improved vegetable cultivars. Twelve qualitative characters and eight quantitative variables were assessed for each of the 21 lines. Categorical differences among lines were observed in characters such as leaflet, pod and seed shape, pod surface texture, anthocyanin pigmentation of stem, flowers and pods. Several of these characters are useful as genetic markers, and cluster analysis of the 21 lines on the basis of qualitative characters enabled two distinct groupings to be identified. Quantitative variation across line means was also high for several of the quantitative variables (a coefficient of variation > 25% for pod length, number of pods per plant, and total pod weight per plant). Principal component analysis applied to the eight variables accounted for 86% of the total variation in just three components with eigenvalues > 1. On Component 1, the characters number of days to first open flower, pod length and pod weight were closely aligned with total weight of pods per plant. Number of pods per plant was not closely aligned with weight of pods per plant. This study has enabled broad differences between groups of lines to be categorized and has identified particular lines with characteristics that recommend them for inclusion as parents in inheritance studies designed to elucidate the contribution that individual characters make to overall productivity, attractiveness, and nutrition of this useful, high protein, vegetable species.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Afuape SO, Okocha PI, Njoku D. 2011. Multivariate assessment of the agromorphological variability and yield components among sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam ) landraces. African J plant Sci. 5(2):123–132. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10722-015-0229-3
BMKG. 2018. Data iklim harian. http//dataonline.bmkg.go.id/akses data.
Borojevic S. 1990. Principles and methods of Plant Breeding. Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
Brown J, Caligari P. 2008. An Introduction to Plant Breeding. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Cooper HD, Spillane C, Hodgkin T. 2001. Broadening the genetic base of crops an Overview. In: Cooper H, Spillane C, Hodgkin T, editors. Broadening Genet base Crop Prod. London: CABI Publishing.
Eagleton GE. 1983. Evaluation of genetic resources in the winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC.) and their utilisation in the development of cultivars for higher latitudes. [place unknown]: Institute of Agriculture University of Western Australia.
Eagleton GE. 2019. Prospects for developing an early maturing variety of winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus) in bogor, Indonesia. Biodiversitas. 20(11):3142–3152.
Erskine W. 1980a. Measurement of the cross pollination of winged bean in Papua New Guinea. Sabrao J. 12(1):11–14.
Erskine W. 1980b. Inheritance of some economic characters in winged bean. Syria.
Erskine W, Kesavan V. 1982. Genetic Variability in the Green Pod Production of Winged Bean. J Hortic Sci. 57(2):209–213.
Fatihah HNN, Maxted N, Rico Arce L. 2012. Cladistic analysis of Psophocarpus Neck. ex DC. (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) based on morphological characters. South African J Bot [Internet]. [accessed 2018 Oct 25] 83:78–88. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0254629912000890

Fitriana N, Susandarini R. 2019. Morphology and taxonomic relationships of shallot (Allium cepa L. group aggregatum) cultivars from Indonesia. Biodiversitas. 20(10):2809–2814.
Handayani, Kusmana T, Liferdi, Hidayat I. 2015. Karakterisasi Morfologi dan Evaluasi Daya Hasil Sayuran Polong Kecipir ( Psophocarpus tetragonolobus ( L .) DC ). J. Hort. 25(2):126–132.
Handayani T. 2013. Kecipir (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus L .), Potensi Lokal yang Terpinggirkan. 001:1–8.
Herath HMW. 1993. Winged Bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus). In: Okubo H, editor. Winged Bean Some Other Veg Med Plants Trop Subtrop. Japan: Nihon Tokushu Nousanbutsu Kyoukai Tokyo japan; p. 3–20.
Hymowitz T, Boyd J. 1977. Origin, ethnobotany and agricultural potentialof the winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus). Econ Bot. 31(2):180–188.
Ikram A, Broughton WJ. 1980. Rhizobia in tropical legumes-VII. Effectiveness of different isolates on Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC. Soil Biol Biochem. 12(1):77–82.
Karikari S. 1972. Pollination requirement of winged beans (Psophocarpus spp.Neck) in Ghana. Ghana jnl agric sci. 5:235–239.
Khan T. 1975. Variation in winged bean in Papua New Guinea. South Easth Asian Genet Resources Lembaga Biologi Nasional LIPI. Bogo. p. 152–156.
Khan T. 1976. Papua New Guinea?: A centre genetic diversity in winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC). Euphytica. 25:693–706.
Klu GYP, Jacobsen E, Van Harten AM. 1997. Induced mutations in winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus L. DC) with low tannin content. Euphytica. 98(1–2):99–107.
Kuswanto, Ardiarini NR, Saptadi D, Waluyo B. 2016. Evaluation and selection on local strains of winged bean in Brawijaya University Indonesia. In: Osman M, Abdullah S, Muhammad N, Milan AR, Sulaiman Z, Rokman, Z (eds). Proceeding of Transactions Persatuan Genetic Malaysia, September 2016.
Lepcha P, Egan AN, Doyle JJ, Sathyanarayana N. 2017. A Review on Current Status and Future Prospects of Winged Bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus) in Tropical Agriculture. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 72(3):225–235.
Mattjik AA, Sumertajaya IM. 2011. Sidik Peubah Ganda dengan Menggunakan SAS. Bogor: IPB Press.
Mohamadali A, Madalageri M. 2004. Correlation and path analysis studies for green vegetable pod yield and yeild attributes in winged bean [Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC]. Indian J Hortic. 61(4):335–337.
Mohamadali A, Madalageri MB. 2015. Analysis of Genetic Variability for Seed Yield and Its Component Characters in Winged Bean [Psophocarpus Tetragonolobus (L.) Dc]. Legum Res Int J. 30(4):290–291.
Mohammadi SA, Prasanna BM. 2003. Analysis of Genetic Diversity in Crop Plants — Salient Statistical Tools. Crop Sci. 43:1235–1248.
Mohanty CS, Verma S, Singh V, Khan S, Gaur P, Gupta P, Nizar MA, Dikshit N, Pattanayak R, Shukla A, et al. 2013. Characterization of winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC.) based on molecular, chemical and physiological parameters. Am J Mol Biol. 03(04):187–197.
Motior MR, Wan Mohamad WO, Wong KC, Shamsuddin ZH. 1998. Nitrogen accumulation and partitioning by winged bean in response to support systems. Exp Agric. 34(1):41–53.
Mukhopadhyay D. 2000. The molecular evolutionary history of a winged bean ?-chymotrypsin inhibitor and modeling of its mutations through structural analyses. J Mol Evol. 50(3):214–223.
NAS. 1975. The Winged Bean?: A High-Protein Crop for The Tropics. Washington DC
Peres-Neto PR, Jackson DA, Somers KM. 2003. Giving meaningful interpretation to ordination axes: Assessing loading significance in principal component analysis. Ecology. 84(9):2347–2363.
Permatasari N., Adiredjo A., Kuswanto. 2018. Evaluasi Keragaman dan Potensi Galur Kecipir (Psopocarpus tetragonolobus L .) Lokal Hasil Koleksi. J. Protan. 6(12):3022–3031.
PVTPP. 2014. Panduan pelaksanaan Uji (PPU) Keunikan, keseragaman dan kestabilan kecipir winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus L .). Jakarta. [Indonesia].
Schiavianto MA, Valio IFM. 1996. Influence of staking on development of winged bean plants. Physiol veg. 8(2):99–103.
Sharma V, Srinivas VR, Surolia A. 1996. Cloning and sequencing of winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus) basic agglutinin (WBA I): Presence of second glycosylation site and its implications in quaternary structure. FEBS Lett. 389(3):289–292.
Tanzi AS, Ho WK, Massawe F, Mayes S. 2019. Development and interaction between plant architecture and yield-related traits in winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC.). Euphytica [Internet]. 215(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-019-2359-8
Thompson AE, Haryono SK. 1979. Sources of resistance to two important diseases of winged bean, Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC. HortScience. 14(4):532–533.
Thompson AE, Haryono SK. 1980. Winged bean: unexploited tropical food crop. HortScience. 15(3):233–237.
Veasey EA, Silva JRDQ, Rosa MS, Borges A, Bressan EDA, Peroni N. 2007. Phenology and morphological diversity of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) landraces of the Vale do Ribeira. Sci Agric. 64(4):416–427.
Wong K. 1983. Effects of Daylength , Temperature , Light Intensity and Applied Growth Substances on the Growth , Flowering and Tuberization of Winged Bean. :1–25.

Most read articles by the same author(s)