Indigenous Dayak Iban customary perspective on sustainable forest management, West Kalimantan, Indonesia

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

SANDY LEO
JATNA SUPRIATNA
KOSUKE MIZUNO
CHRIS MARGULES

Abstract

Abstract. Leo S, Supriatna J, Mizuno K, Margules C. 2021. Indigenous Dayak Iban customary perspective on sustainable forest management, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 23: 424-435. Borneo is the third-largest island in the world, is rich in biodiversity and has diverse unique ecosystems. However, deforestation and land tenure conflicts continue to threaten the indigenous people who rely on forest resources for their livelihoods and well-being. This study aimed to identify the ecosystem services and the value of customary forest resources, identify local wildlife species, and document the traditional knowledge that the Iban indigenous community of West Kalimantan use to manage their customary forest. We collected relevant data using Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based Assessment (TESSA), in-depth interviews, and wildlife surveys. The customary forest provides significant ecosystem services, mainly carbon sequestration (exceeds US$ 52 million/year), water-related services (exceeds US$ 21 million/year), and the 52 wildlife species recorded in the customary forest. Forest resources are managed successfully by the community through traditional knowledge and customary laws passed down for generations. The integration of local and expert knowledge and involvement from all related stakeholders would boost sustainable forest management and enhance the economic benefits and livelihoods of the community. Following current trends, recognizing customary forest and appropriate sustainable forest management could effectively tackle deforestation and land tenure conflicts in Borneo. Further studies should be considered to develop specific activities on managing the forest sustainably that the community can implement and evaluate.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Amenu BT. 2018. Review: Forest management and conservation practices in Ethiopia: Opportunities and constraints. Asian J For 2: 77-82. DOI: 10.13057/asianjfor/r010204.
Arcipowski E, Schwartz J, Davenport L, Hayes M, Nolan T. 2017. Clean water, clean life: Promoting healthier, accessible water in Rural Appalachia. J Contemp Water Res Educ 161: 1-18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1936-704X.2017.3248.x.
Asriyani H, Verheijen B. 2020. Protecting the Mbau Komodo in Riung, Flores: Local adat, national conservation and ecotourism developments. For Soc 4: 20-34. DOI: 10.24259/fs.v4i1.7465.
Badan Registrasi Wilayah Adat (BRWA). 2021. Peta wilayah adat. Available at: https://brwa.or.id/sig/. Date accessed: 5 April 2021. [Indonesian]
Barbier EB, Tesfaw AT. 2012. Can REDD+ save the forest? The role of payments and tenure. Forests 3: 881-895. DOI: 10.3390/f3040881.
Basic Agrarian Law (BAL) No. 5/1960. Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria. Direktorat Jenderal Pengendalian Pencemaran dan Kerusakan Lingkungan, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. [Indonesian]
Beaman L, Dillon A. 2012. Do household definitions matter in survey design? Results from a randomized survey experiment in Mali. J Dev Econ 98: 124-135. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.06.005.
Birch JC, Thapa I, Balmford A, Bradbury RB, Brown C, Butchart SHM, Gurung H, Hughes FMR, Mulligan M, Pandeya B, Peh KSH, Stattersfield AJ, Walpole M, Thomas DHL. 2014. What benefits do community forests provide and to whom? A rapid assessment of ecosystem services from a Himalayan forest, Nepal. Ecosyst Serv 8: 118-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.005.
Clerc J. 2011. Tenure security and oil palm expansion on customary lands in Indonesia: Case study in West Kalimantan. In: Sustaining Commons. Sustaining Our Future, the Thirteenth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons. Hyderabad, India, 10-14 January.
Daramola JO, Adesuyi FE, Olugbadieye OG, Akinbowale AS, Adekunle VAJ. 2020. Rate of timber harvest and the effects of illegal activities on forest conservation in Southwestern Nigeria. Asian J For 5: 8-16. DOI: 10.13057/asianjfor/r050102.
Darmadi H. 2017. Dayak and Their Daily Life. J Educ Teach Learn 2: 42-46. DOI: 10.26737/jetl.v2i1.145.
de la Fuente T, Hajjar R. 2013. Do current forest carbon standards include adequate requirements to ensure indigenous peoples’ rights in REDD projects? Intl For Rev 15: 427-441. DOI: 10.1505/146554813809025676.
De Royer S, Visser LE, Galudra G, Pradhan U, Van Noordwijk M. 2015. Self-identification of indigenous people in post-independence Indonesia: A historical analysis in the context of REDD+. Intl For Rev 17: 282-297. DOI: 10.1505/146554815815982648.
Deal RL, Cochran B, LaRocco G. 2012. Bundling of ecosystem services to increase forestland value and enhance sustainable forest management. For Policy Econ 17: 69-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.12.007.
Dhiaulhaq A, Wiset K, Thaworn R, Kane S, Gritten D. 2017. Forest, water and people: The roles and limits of mediation in transforming watershed conflict in Northern Thailand. For Soc 1: 44. DOI: 10.24259/fs.v1i2.2049.
Donofrio S, Maguire P, Zwick S, Merry W. 2020. Voluntary Carbon and the Post-Pandemic Recovery: A Special Climate Week NYC 2020 Installment of Ecosystem Marketplace’s State of Voluntary Carbon Markets 2020 Report. Washington DC, USA.
Dworkin SL. 2012. Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Arch Sex Behav 41: 1319-1320. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6.
Forestry Law No. 41/1999. Kehutanan. Direktorat Jenderal Pengendalian Pencemaran dan Kerusakan Lingkungan, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. [Indonesian]
Gaveau DLA, Sloan S, Molidena E, Yaen H, Sheil D, Abram NK, Ancrenaz M, Nasi R, Quinones M, Wielaard N, Meijaard E. 2014. Four decades of forest persistence, clearance and logging on Borneo. PLoS One 9: 1-11. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101654.
Grêt-Regamey A, Brunner SH, Altwegg J, Christen M, Bebi P. 2013. Integrating expert knowledge into mapping ecosystem services tradeoffs for sustainable forest management. Ecol Soc 18: 1-21. DOI: 10.5751/ES-05800-180334.
Grizzetti B, Lanzanova D, Liquete C, Reynaud A, Cardoso AC. 2016. Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management. Environ Sci Policy 61: 194-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.008.
Hasudungan A. 2018. Political Ecology of Palm Oil Development in the Kapuas Hulu District of West Kalimantan. [Dissertation]. Unversity of Sydney, Australia.
Hauhs M, Lange H. 2000. Sustainability in forestry: Theory and a historical case study. In: von Gadow K, Pukkala T, Tome M (eds). Sustainable Forest Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-9819-9_2.
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) 2021. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available at: https://www.iucnredlist.org/. Date assessed: 5 April 2021.
ITTO PD 617/11. 2015. Biodiversity Survey in the Sub Watershed Embaloh, Betung Kerihun National Park, 3rd ed. ITTO PD 617/11, Jakarta. [Indonesian]
Jamshed S. 2014. Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. J Basic Clin Pharm 5 (4): 87-88. DOI: 10.4103/0976-0105.141942.
Jessup TT, Vayda AP. 1988. Dayaks and Forests in Interior Borneo. Expedition 30: 5-17.
Kaffashi S, Radam A, Shamsudin MN, Yacob MR, Nordin NH. 2015. Ecological conservation, ecotourism, and sustainable management: The case of Penang National Park. Forests 6: 2345-2370. DOI: 10.3390/f6072345.
Kapuas Hulu Local Regulation No. 20/2015. Penetapan Kabupaten Kapuas Hulu sebagai Kabupaten Konservasi. Peraturan Daerah (PERDA) Kabupaten Kapuas Hulu. [Indonesian]
Kapuas Hulu Regent Regulation No. 71/2018. Tarif Air Minum Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum. Peraturan Daerah (PERDA) Kabupaten Kapuas Hulu. [Indonesian]
Koh LP, Kettle CJ, Sheil D, Lee TM, Giam X, Gibson L, Clements GR. 2013. Biodiversity State and Trends in Southeast Asia. In: Levin SA (eds). Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. Elsevier, Amsterdam. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-384719-5.00357-9.
Kurniadi R, Koeslulati EE. 2020. Short Communication: Willingness to participate in planting and protecting mangrove forest: community response related to mangrove fruit product utilization in Pariti, Timor Island, Indonesia. Trop Drylands 4: 1-4. DOI: 10.13057/tropdrylands/t040101.
Kusnandar VB. 2019. Berapa jumlah penduduk Kalimantan?. Available at: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2019/07/08/berapa-jumlah-penduduk-kalimantan. Date assessed: 2 June 2021. [Indonesian]
Langston JD, Riggs RA, Sururi Y, Sunderland T, Munawir M. 2017. Estate crops more attractive than community forests in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Land 6: 1-14. DOI: 10.3390/land6010012.
Leonald L, Rowland D. 2016. Drivers and effects of agrarian change in Kapuas Hulu Regency, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. In: Deakin L, Kshatriya M, Sunderland T (eds). Agrarian Change in Tropical Landscapes. CIFOR, Bogor.
Lindenmayer DB, Margules CR, Botkin DB. 2000. Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management. Conserv Biol 14: 941-950. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98533.x.
Lindenmayer DB, Westgate MJ. 2020. Are flagship, umbrella and keystone species useful surrogates to understand the consequences of landscape change? Curr Landsc Ecol Rep 5: 76-84. DOI: 10.1007/s40823-020-00052-x.
Liu P, Gilchrist P, Taylor B, Ravenscroft N. 2017. The spaces and times of community farming. Agric Human Values 34: 363-375. DOI: 10.1007/s10460-016-9717-0.
Lopa D, Mwanyoka I, Jambiya G, Massoud T, Harrison P, Ellis-Jones M, Blomley T, Leimona B, Van Noordwijk M, Burgess ND. 2012. Towards operational payments for water ecosystem services in Tanzania: A case study from the Uluguru Mountains. Oryx 46 (1): 34-44. DOI: 10.1017/S0030605311001335.
Lucas SR. 2014. Beyond the existence proof: Ontological conditions, epistemological implications, and in-depth interview research. Qual Quant 48 (1): 387-408. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-012-9775-3.
Lusiana B, Widodo R, Mulyoutami E, Nugroho DA, van Noordwijk M. 2008. Assessing Hydrological Situation of Kapuas Hulu Basin, Kapuas Hulu Regency, West Kalimantan (No. 57). World Agroforestry Centre, Bogor. DOI: 10.5716/WP15420.PDF.
Mackinnon K, Hatta G, Halim H, Mangalik A. 1996. The Ecology of Kalimantan. Oxford University Press, Singapore.
Margules C, Boedhihartono AK, Langston JD, Riggs RA, Sari DA, Sarkar S, Sayer JA, Supriatna J, Winarni NL. 2020. Transdisciplinary science for improved conservation outcomes. Environ Conserv 47: 224-233. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892920000338.
McConkey KR. 2018. Seed Dispersal by primates in Asian habitats: From species, to communities, to conservation. Intl J Primatol 39 (3): 466-492. DOI: 10.1007/s10764-017-0013-7.
Meijaard E, Abram NK, Wells JA, Pellier AS, Ancrenaz M, Gaveau DLA, Runting RK, Mengersen K. 2013. People’s perceptions about the importance of forests on Borneo. PLoS One 8: 1-4. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073008.
Meijaard E, Santika T, Wilson KA, Budiharta S, Kusworo A, Law EA, Friedman R, Hutabarat JA, Indrawan TP, Sherman J, St. John FAV, Struebig MJ. 2021. Toward improved impact evaluation of community forest management in Indonesia. Conserv Sci Pract 3: 1-14. DOI: 10.1111/csp2.189.
Ministry of Environment and Forestry Decree No. SK.3238/MENLHK-PSKL/PKTHA/PSL.1/5/2020. Penetapan Hutan Adat Menua Sungai Utik kepada Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dayak Iban Menua Sungai Utik Ketemenggungan Jalai Lintang. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, Indonesia. [Indonesian]
Myers R, Intarini D, Sirait MT, Maryudi A. 2017. Claiming the forest: Inclusions and exclusions under Indonesia’s ‘new’ forest policies on customary forests. Land Use Policy 66: 205-213. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.039.
Ninan KN. 2009. Introduction. In: Ninan KN (eds). Conserving and Valuing Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity: Economic, Institutional and Social Challenges. Earthscan, London.
Nyuak L, Dunn E. 1906. Religious rites and customs of the Ibans or Dyaks of Sarawak (conclusion-with figures). Anthropos: 403-425.
Oliver I, Beattie AJ. 1993. A possible method for the rapid assessment of biodiversity. Conserv Biol 7: 562-568. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07030562.x.
Parrotta J, Yeo-Chang Y, Camacho LD. 2016. Traditional knowledge for sustainable forest management and provision of ecosystem services. Intl J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 12: 1-4. DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2016.1169580.
Parrotta JA, Agnoletti M. 2007. Traditional forest knowledge: Challenges and opportunities. For Ecol Manag 249: 1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.05.022.
Pearson T, Walker S, Brown S. 2005. Sourcebook for Land Use, Land-use Change and Forestry Projects, Winrock International and the BioCarbon Fund of the World Bank. Washington DC, USA.
Peh KSH, Balmford A, Bradbury RB, Brown C, Butchart SHM, Hughes FMR, Stattersfield A, Thomas DHL, Walpole M, Bayliss J, Gowing D, Jones JPG, Lewis SL, Mulligan M, Pandeya B, Stratford C, Thompson JR, Turner K, Vira B, Willcock S, Birch JC. 2013. TESSA: A toolkit for rapid assessment of ecosystem services at sites of biodiversity conservation importance. Ecosyst Serv 5: 51-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.003.
Peh KSH, Balmford AP, Bradbury RB, Brown C, Butchart SHM, Hughes FMR, MacDonald MA, Stattersfield AJ, Thomas DHL, Trevelyan RJ, Walpole M, Merriman JC. 2017. Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based Assessment (TESSA). Cambridge Conservation Initiatives, UK.
Rowland JA, Bland LM, Keith DA, Juffe-Bignoli D, Burgman MA, Etter A, Ferrer-Paris JR, Miller RM, Skowno AL, Nicholson E. 2019. Ecosystem indices to support global biodiversity conservation. Conserv Lett 13: 1-11. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12680.
Ruiz-Mallén I, Corbera E. 2013. Community-based conservation and traditional ecological knowledge. Ecol Soc 18: 1-19. DOI: 10.5751/ES-05867-180412.
Saner P, Loh YY, Ong RC, Hector A. 2012. Carbon stocks and fluxes in tropical lowland dipterocarp rainforests in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. PLoS One 7: 1-11. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029642.
Sellato B. 2002. Innermost Borneo: Studies in Dayak Cultures. NUS Press, Singapore.
Setyawan AD. 2010. Review: Biodiversity conservation strategy in a native perspective; case study of shifting cultivation at the Dayaks of Kalimantan. Nusantara Biosci 2: 97-108. DOI: 10.13057/nusbiosci/n020208.
Toochi EC. 2018. Carbon sequestration: How much can forestry sequester CO2? For Res Eng Intl J 2: 148-150. DOI: 10.15406/freij.2018.02.00040.
Wadley RL, Colfer CJP. 2004. Sacred forest, hunting, conservation in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Hum Ecol 32: 313-338. DOI: 10.1023/B:HUEC.0000028084.30742.d0.
Wadley RL, Colfer CJP, Hood IG. 1997. Hunting primates and managing forests: The case of Iban forest farmers in Indonesian Borneo. Hum Ecol 25: 243-271. DOI: 10.1023/A:1021926206649.
Walpole MJ, Leader-Williams N. 2002. Tourism and flagship species in conservation. Biodivers Conserv 11: 543-547. DOI: 10.1023/A:1014864708777.
World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). 2017. The Environmental Status of Borneo 2016 Report, Jakarta.
World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). 2018. Heart of Borneo Workplan 2018 - 2020. Heart of Borneo Leader, Indonesia.
Yasmi Y, Colfer CJP, Yuliani L, Indriatmoko Y, Heri V. 2007. Conflict management approaches under unclear boundaries of the commons: Experiences from Danau Sentarum National Park, Indonesia. Intl For Rev 9: 597-609. DOI: 10.1505/ifor.9.2.597.
Yuliani EL, de Jong EBP, Knippenberg L, Bakara DO, Salim MA, Sunderland T. 2018. Keeping the land: Indigenous communities’ struggle over land use and sustainable forest management in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Ecol Soc 23 (4): 1-12. DOI: 10.5751/ES-10640-230449.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>