The dietary, productivity, and economic value of swiftlet (Aerodramus fuciphagus) farming in East Kalimantan, Indonesia

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

MURSIDAH
ABUBAKAR M. LAHJIE
MASJAYA
YAYA RAYADIN
YOSEP RUSLIM
MEIDI B. JUDINNUR
ANDY

Abstract

Abstract. Mursidah, Lahjie AM, Masjaya, Rayadin Y, Ruslim Y, Judinnur MB, Andy. 2021. The dietary, productivity, and economic value of swiftlet (Aerodramus fuciphagus) farming in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 22: 2528-2537. Edible-nest swiftlets have many health benefits. The availability of edible-nest swiftlets from caves is decreasing, while the demand for edible-nest swiftlets is getting higher. Swiftlet farming is carried out to meet this demand. The location of swiftlet farming should be close to the feeding sources. Swiftlet is flying insectivorous animals. A financial feasibility assessment is carried out to determine the feasibility of the business. This study aims to determine the composition of land cover, determine the insect order of feed sources, and analyze the production and financial feasibility of swiftlet farming. The study was carried out from June to December 2019. The composition of land cover was determined using the supervised classification method, the order of insects was known using the insect determination key, while production and financial feasibility were analyzed using the Net B/C, NPV, IRR, and PP methods. The observed location and swiftlet farming were determined purposefully. The results of this study show that the land cover was dominated by shrubs (56.58%) and secondary forest (27.3%); both types of land cover are suitable for swiftlet farming locations. The dominant insects found in shrubs and wetland shrubs are Diptera (78.25%), in rice fields are Diptera (86.7%) and in oil palm plantations are Diptera (29.4%) and Hymenoptera (27.78%). Edible-nest swiftlets harvest begins in the third year, with a production period of between 17-34 years. From the financial feasibility, it can be concluded that swiftlet farming is feasible.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Ahmad H, Ong SQ, Tan EH. 2019. The diet for edible-nest swiftlets: nutritional composition and cost of life stages of Megaselia scalaris Loew (Diptera: Phoridae) bred on 3 commercial breeding materials. Intl J Insect Sci 1 1(2019): 1-5. doi: 10.1177/1179543318823533
Alias A, Poh AY, Ma NZ, Din MAM. 2013. Investment in swiftlet hotels in Malaysia – Does ROI compensate investment risks?. Afr J Bus Manage 7(38): 3936-3943. doi: 10.5897/AJBM11.032
Arshad A. 2012. Net present value is better than internal rate of return. IJCRB 4(8): 211-219.
Asciuto A, Schimmenti E, Cottone C, Borsellino V. 2019. A finansial feasibility study on aquaponic system in a Mediterranean urban context. Urban For Urban Gree 38(2019):397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.02.001
Ashari. 2020. Ekspor Sarang Burung Walet Masih Tangguh pada Masa Pandemi. Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian. Kementerian Pertanian. http://pse.litbang.pertanian.go.id/ind/index.php/covid-19/berita-covid19/541-ekspor-sarang-burung-walet-masih-tangguh-pada-masa-pandemi.[Indonesia]
Babji AS, Nurfatin MH, Etty SIK, Masitah M. 2015. Secrets of edible bird nest. UTAR Agric Sci J 1(1): 32-37.
Babji AS, Daud NA. 2019. Physicochemical roperties of glycan within swiftlet’s nest (Aerodramus fuciphagus) as Potential Prebiotic. ACTA Sci Med Sci 3(9) : 09-13.
Banerjee S. 2015. Contravention between NPV and IRR due to timing of cash flows: a case of capital budgeting decision of an oil refinery company. Am J Theoretical Appl Bus 1(2) : 48-52. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtab.20150102.13
Begon M, Townsend CR, Harper JL. 2006. Ecology: from individuals to ecosystems, 4th edn. Blackwell, Oxford UK.
Berihun ML,Tsunekawa A, Haregeweyn N, Meshesha DT, Adgo E, Tsubo M, Masunaga T, Fenta AA, Sultan D, Yibeltal M. 2019. Exploring land use/land cover changes, drivers and their implications in contrasting agro-ecological environments of Ethiopia. Land Use Policy 87(2019): 104052. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104052
Cadigal GM. 2015. Collection and trade dynamics of edible nest swiftlet (Aerodramus fuciphagus Thunberg, 1812) nest in northern Palawan, Philippines. Our Palawan 1, 23–34.
Careena S, Sani D, Tan SN, Lim CW, Hassan S, Norhafizah M, Kirby BP, Ideris A, Stanslas J, Basri HB, Lim CTS. 2018. Effect of edible bird’s nest extract on lipopolysaccharide-induced impairment of learning and memory in wistar rats. Hindawi evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine 2018:1-7. doi: 10.1155/2018/9318789
Chan GKL, Wong ZCF, Lam KYC, Cheng LKW, Zhang LM, Lin H, Dong TT, Tsim KWK. 2015. Edible bird’s nest, an Asian health food supplement, possesses skin lightening activities: identification of N-acetylneuraminic acid as active ingredient. J Cosmet, Dermatol Sci Appl (5) : 262-274.
Chua LS and Zukefli SN. 2016. A comprehensive review of edible bird nests and swiftlet farming. J Integr Med 2016, 14(6): 415-428. doi: 10.1016/S2095-4964(16)60282-0
Chye SM, Tai SK, Koh RY, Ng KY. 2017. A Mini Review on Medicinal Effects of Edible Bird’s Nest. Lett Health Biol Sci 2(1): 65- 67. doi: 10.15436/2475-6245.17.016
Connolly C. 2016. ‘A place for everything’ : moral landscape of ‘swiftlet farming’ in George Town, Malaysia. Geoforum 77(2016) : 181-191. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.11.005
Daud NA, Sarbini SR, Babji AS, Yusop SM, Lim SJ. 2019. Characterization of edible swiflet”s nest as a prebiotic ingredient using a simulated colon model. Ann of Microbiol 69(14):1235-1246.
Delgado TS, McCall MK, Binqüist CL. 2016. Recognized but not supported: Assessing the incorporation of non-timber forest products into Mexican forest policy. For Policy Econ 71: 36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.07.002
Duguma LA. 2013. Financial analysis of agroforestry land uses and its implication for smallholder farmer livelihood improvement in Ethiopia. Agrofor Syst 87: 217-231.
Dunn PO, Winkler DW, Whittingham LA, Hannon AJ, Robertson RJ. 2011. A test of the mismatch hypothesis: how is timing of reproduction related to food abundance in an aerial insectivore?. Ecology 92:450–461.
Fischer JH, Kaaden AVD. 2016. Glossy Swiftlet Collocalia esculenta exhibiting signs of the pigment defificiency ‘dilution’. BirdingASIA 25 (2016): 84–86.
Harbi J, Erbaugh JT, Sidiq M, Haasler B, Nurrochmat DR. 2018. Making a bridge between livelihoods and forest conservation: Lessons from nontimber forest products' utilization in South Sumatera, Indonesia. For Policy Econ 94: 1–10.
Hopkinson M. 2016. The case for project net present value (NPV) and NPV risk models. PM World J V(VI): 2-9.
Hoang LH, Binh DT, Thu NTA. 2014. Population genetics white-nest swiftlet Aerodramus fuciphagus. Sub species in Vietnam. J Agris Rural Dev June 2014:77-82.
Hoang LH, Binh DT, Thu NTA, Binh CH. 2015. Population genetics white-nest swiftlet Aerodramus fuciphagus in Vietnam. JFST Special issue-2015.
Hou Z, Imam MU, Ismail M, Azmi NH, Ismail N, Ideris A, Mahmud R. 2015. Lactoferrin and ovotransferrin contribute toward antioxidative effects of Edible Bird’s Nest against hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress in human SH-SY5Y cells. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem June 2015. doi : 10.1080/09168451.2015.1050989
Hou Z, Iman MU, Ismail M, Ooi DJ, Ideris A, Mahmud R. 2015. Nutrigenomic effects of edible bird’s nest on insulin signaling in ovariectomized rats. Drug Des. Dev. Ther.(2015) 9 ; 4115-4125. doi : 10.2147/DDDT.S80743
Ibrahim SH, Baharun A, Kabiru A. 2011. Study on suitable construction materials for swiftlet farming using energi plus. University Malaysia Serawak (Unimas). ICOTOC.
Idris A, Abdullah AA, Rehman MA. 2014. An overview of the study of the right habitat and suitable environment factors that influence the success of edible bird nest production in Malaysia. Asian J Agr Res 8(1):1-16. doi: 10.3923/ajar.2014.1.16
Jamaluddin NR, Tukiran NA., Fadzillah NA, Fathi S. 2019. Overview of edible bird’s nest and their contemporary issues. Food Control 104: 247-255. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.04.042
Kamaruddin R, Engku Ismail CEM, Ahmad SA. 2019. Key factors for the sustainable production of swiftlet birds’ nest industry in Malaysia:a case study in Nothern Peninsular Malaysia. Int J Sup Chain Mgt 8 33(1):724:733.
Ke S, Yan R, Qiao D, Zhu L. 2018. Cost-benefit analysis of an agroforestry innovationon karst land: replacing sweet potato by sealwort (Polygonatum cyrtonema) under plum trees in Chunfeng village, Sichuan province, China. For Trees Livelihoods 27: 217-229.
Kishimoto-Yamada K & Itioka T, 2015. How much have we learned about seasonality in tropical insect abundance since Wolda (1988)? Entomol Sci18(4): 407-419. doi: 10.1111/ens.12134
Looi QH, Omar AR. 2016. Swiftlets and edible bird’s nest industry in Asia. PJSRR (2016) 2(1) : 32-48.
Lourie SA, Tompkins DM. 2000. The diets of Malaysian Swiftlets. Int J Avian Sci 142(4) : 596 - 602. doi: 10.1111/j. 1474 -919X.2000.tb04459.x
Luke SH, Fayle TM, Eggleton P, Turner EC, Davies RG. 2014. Functional structure of ant and termite assemblagesin old growth forest, logged forest and oil palm plantationin Malaysian Borneo. Biodivers Conserv (2014) 23 : 2817–2832. doi: 10.1007/s10531-014-0750-2
Ma F, Liu D. 2012. Sketch of the edible bird’s nest and its important bioactivities. Food Rest Int 48(2012) : 559-567. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2012.06.001
Manchi S and Sankaran R. 2014. Protection of the white-nest swiftlet Aerodramus fuciphagus in the Andaman Islands, India: an assessment. Article in Oryx · April 2014. doi: 10.1017/S0030605311000603
Mane AM and Manchi SS. 2017. Roosting patterns of the Edible-Nest Swiftlet (Aerodramus fuciphagus) of the Andaman Islands: effects of lunar phase and breeding chronology. Emu · June 2017. doi: 10.1080/01584197.2017.1336065
Mursidah, Lahjie AM, Masjaya, Rayadin Y, Ruslim Y. 2020. The ecology, productivity and economic of swiftlet (Aerodramus fuciphagus) farming in Kota Bangun, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 21(7): 3117-3126. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d210732 [Indonesian]
Nigussie Z, Tsunekawa A, Haregeweyn N, Adgo E, Tsubo M, Ayalew Z, Abele S. 2020. Economic and financial sustainability of an Acacia decurrens-based Taungya system for farmers in the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Land Use Policy 90 (2020): 104331. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104331
Nituda CJP, Nuneza OM. 2016. Diet Composition of two species of swiftlets from caves of Northern Mindanao, Philippines. BEPLS 5 (5) : 48-52.
Nor ASM, Khamis NHH, Yahya A, Khalil K. 2016. Potential and sustainabilityof swiftlet industries in Malaysia. Int J Sci Technol 1(1) :1-7.
Nugroho HK, Budiman A. 2013. Complete Guide Swiftlet . Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta. [Indonesian]
Petkliang N, Gale GA, Brunton DH, Bumrungsri S. 2017. Wetland, forest and open paddy land area the key for foraging habitats for Germain’s Swiftlet (Aerodramus inexpectatus germani) in Southern Thailand. Trop Conserv Sci 10 : 1-12. doi: 10.1177/1940082917698467
Rahman MA, Ghazali PL, Lian CJ. 2018. Enviromental parameters in successful edible bird nest swiftlet houses in Trengganu. J Sustain Sci Manag 13(1): 127-131.
Rahman MA, Ghazali PL, Lian CJ, Basari N, Mamat M, Foziah H, Afthanorhan A. 2019. Suitable ranching practices in successful edible bird nest swiftlet houses in Trengganu. IJRTE 7(5S4):600-604.
Rahman SFSA, Nor HM, Burhanuddin M. 2016. Diversity of the insects in the diet of edible nest swiftlets in oil palm plantations. JBES 8(4): 39-48.
Ramji MFS, Rahman MA. 2013. Roosting and nest-building Behaviour of the white-nest Swiftlet Aerodramus Fuciphagus (Thunberg) (Aves: Apodidae) in farmed colonies. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 2013 Supplement No. 29: 225–235.
Razali R, Yaakop S, Abdullah M, Ghazali SZ, Zuki AA. 2015. Insect species composition in an under SRI management in Tanjung Karang, Selangor, Malaysia. Malays Appl Biol 44(4): 73–80.
Rist L, Shanley P, Sunderland T, Sheil D, Ndoye O, Liswanti N, Tieguhong J. 2012. The impacts of selective logging on non-timber forest products of livelihood importance. For Ecol Manag 268: 57-69. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.037
Romele L. 2013. Estimation of internal rate of return (IRR) to investments in education in Latvia. Int J Soc Sci Humanity 3(1): 1-4. doi:10.7763/IJSSH.2013.V3.180
Rosyidi S. 2020. Introduction to Economic Theory : Approaches to micro and macro economic theory. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta. [Indonesian]
Saengkrajang W, Matan N, Matan N. 2013. Nutritional composition of the farmed edible bird’s nest (Collocalia fuchipaga) in Thailand. J Food Compos Anal 31(1): 41-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2013.05.001
Sakai S, Choy YK, Yamada KK, Takano KT, Ichikawa M, Samejima H, Kato Y, Soda R, Ushio M, Saizen I, Nakashizuka T, Itioka T. 2016. Social and ecological factors associated with the use of non-timber forest products by people in rural Borneo. Biol Conserv 204: 340-349. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.022
Sanchez-Clavijo LM, Hearns J, Quintana-Ascencio PF. 2016. Modeling the effect of habitat selection mechanisms on population responses to landscape structure. Ecol Model 328: 99–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.03.004
Sarmah R. 2012. Non-timber forest products: extraction and impact on plant community structure in and around Namdapha National Park of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Indian J. Plant Sci 1 (3) : 192-207.
Shah SW, Aziz NA. 2014. Morpoholgy of the lingual aparatus of the swiftlet, Aerodramus fuciphagus (Aves, Apodiformes, Apodidae). J Microsc Ultrastruct 2(2014) :100-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jmau.2014.02.006
Shukri NHM, Nawi NM, Abdullah AM, Man N. 2018. Consumer’s perception on the quality of controversial contents in edible bird’s nest products. PJSRR(2108) 4(1):1-9.
Siregar EH, Atmowidi T, Kahono S. 2016. Diversity and Abundance of Insect Pollinators in Different Agricultural Lands in Jambi, Sumatera. Hayati 23(1): 13-17. doi: 10.1016/j.hjb.2015.11.002. [Indonesian]
Sisak L, Riedl M, Dudik R. 2016. Non-market non-timber forest products in the Czech Republic—Their socio-economic effects and trends in forest land use. Land Use Policy 50: 390–398. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.006
Sososutiksno C, Gasperz J. 2017. Economic and finansial feasibility of Abalone culture development in Hulaliu Village, District of Maluku Tengah, Maluku Province. AACL Bioflux 10(6):1492-1498.
Sugiyono. 2016. Research method, quantitave, qualitative and R&D. Alfabeta. Bandung. [Indonesian]
Taradipha MRR, Rushayati SB, Haneda NF. 2019. Environmental characteristics of insect communities. JPSL 9(2): 394-404. doi: 10.29244/jpsl.9.2.394-404. [Indonesian]
Thorburn C. 2015. The edible nest swiftlet industry in South Asia : Capitalism meets commensalism. Hum Ecol43(1) : 179-184.
Tylianakis JM, Klein A, Tscharntke T. 2005. Spaiotemporal variation in the diversity of Hymenoptera across a tropical habitat gradient. Ecology 86(12):3296-3302. doi: 10.1890/05-0371
Vimala B, Hussain H, Wan Nazaimoon WM. 2012. Effects of edible bird’s nest on tumour necrosis factor-alpha secretion, nitric oxide production and cell viability of lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Food Agr Immunol 23:303-314. doi: 10.1080/09540105.2011.625494
Watanabe YY, Ito M,Takahashi A. 2014 Testing optimal foragingtheory in a penguin–krill system. Proc. R. Soc. B281: 20132376. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2376
Wong RS. 2013. Edible bird’s nest: Food or medicine?. Chin J Integr Med 19: 642-649. doi: 10.1007/s11655-013-1563-y
Zhang S, Lai X, Liu X, Li Y, Li B, Huang X, Zhang Q, Chen W, Lin L, Yang G. 2012. Competitive enzyme-linked immunoassay for sialoglycoprotein of edible bird’s nest in food and cosmetic. J Agr Food Chem 60:3580-3585. doi: 10.1021/jf300865a
Zulkifli DA, Mansor R, Ajat MMM, Abas F, Ideris A, Abu J. 2019. Differentiation of Malaysian farming and commercialised edible bird’s nests through nutritional composition analysis. Pertanika J Trop Agric. Sci 42(3); 871-881

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>