Species richness of trees in disturbed habitats within a protected area and its implications for conservation: The case of Mt. Apo Natural Park, Mindanao Island, Philippines




Abstract. Zapanta BR, Achondo MJMM, Raganas AFM, Camino FA, Delima, AGD, Mantiquilla JA, Puentespina, RP, Salvaña FRP. 2019. Species richness of trees in disturbed habitats within a protected area and its implications for conservation: The case of Mt. Apo Natural Park, Mindanao Island, Philippines. Biodiversitas 20: 2081-2091. In order to improve forest management, it is fundamental to develop baseline information on species distribution i.e., richness and presence of endemic and threatened species in varying conditions of environmental degradation. In the Philippines, there is a growing number of studies which provided important information on pristine habitats (e.g. primary forest), however, there is a scarcity of studies on disturbed habitats. Here, we present baseline information on the tree species diversity in disturbed habitats like those portions converted to agricultural lands planted with fruit trees and other commercial crops within Mt. Apo National Park. A total of 139 tree species including a single gymnosperm was identified within the study sites. Of the species identified, the dominant families included Moraceae, Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Meliaceae, Lauraceae, Myrtaceae, Arecaceae, Dipterocarpaceae, and Verbenaceae. Nineteen species were considered endemic including the Mindanao endemic, Lindera apoensis. Within this number, 47% are considered threatened on their range and four species viz. Parashorea malaanonan, Shorea contorta, and Shorea negrosensis are Critically Endangered with decreasing population records. The results of this current study suggest that disturbed habitats in Mt. Apo Natural Park still harbor endemic and threatened species, which are ecologically and economically important. Establishing a list of tree species in the area provides important information needed for the restoration of some disturbed areas which are abandoned by locals. The presence of endemic and threatened species also indicates that conservation, protection, and forest management efforts should be extended and allocated towards disturbed areas in the national park.


Agduma AR, Achondo MJM, Bretaña BLP, Bello VP, Remollo LL, Mancao LS, Supremo JP, Salem JG, Salvaña FR. 2011. Diversity of Vascular Plant Species in an Agroforest; The Case of Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) Plantation in Makilala. North Cotabato. Philipp J Crop Sci 36(3): 57?64.

Amoroso CB, Coritico FP, Amoroso VB. 2013. Diversity and status of plants in three mountain ecosystems in southern Mindanao, Philippines. Asian Journal of Biodiversity 83: 50-73.

Amoroso VB, Aspiras RA. 2011. Hamiguitan Range: A sanctuary for native flora. Saudi J Biol Sci 18(1): 7-15.

Apan A, Suarez LA, Maraseni T, Castillo JA. 2017. The rate, extent and spatial predictors of forest loss (2000-2012) in the terrestrial protected areas of the Philippines. Appl. Geogr. 81: 32-42.

Arances JB, Amoroso VB, Comilap R, Comilap C, Galvezo JB, Gruezo WS, Lumaray C, Montimar B, Opiso G, Pacut G, Ridsdale C, Rufila L, Sacal S, Tan S, Visser L. 2004. Development of Participatory Methodology for Inventory and Assessment of Floral Resources and their Characterization in the Montane Forests of Mt. Malindang. PDM Press Inc. Quezon City, Philippines 1: 15?94.

Barcelona JF, Nickrent DL, LaFrankie JV, Callado JRC, Pelser PB. 2013. Co's Digital Flora of the Philippines: Plant identification and conservation through cybertaxonomy. Philipp J Sci 142: 57-67.

Brown RM, Diesmos AC. 2009. Philippines, Biology. Encyclopedia of Islands. University of California Press, Berkeley, 723-732pp.

Bryan BA, Raymond C, Crossman ND, King D. 2011. Comparing spatially explicit ecological and social values for natural areas to identify effective conservation strategies. Conserv Biol 25(1), 172-181.

Colwell RK, Rahbek C, Gotelli NJ. 2004. The mid?domain effect and species richness patterns: What have we learned so far? American Naturalist 1: 23?63.

Corlett RT, Primack RB. 2008. Tropical rainforest conservation: a global perspective. Trop For Comm Ecol 15(51): 442-457.

Cronk QCB, Fuller JL. 1995. Plant invaders: the threat to natural ecosystems. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.

Department of Environment and Natural Resources?Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau. 2009. Assessing Progress Towards the 2010 Biodiversity Target: The Fourth National Report to the Convention on Biological. Diversity. Cavite, Philippines.

Fernando ES, Co LL, Lagunzad DA, Gruezo WS, Barcelona JF, Madulid DA, Lapis AB, Texon GI, Manila AC, Zamora PM. 2008. Threatened Plants of the Philippines: a preliminary assessment. Philippine Threatened Plants. (2): 23?54.

Fernando E. 2009. Habitats of Philippine Dipterocarps, in: Dipterocarps of the Philippines, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines, 1?59pp.

Gregorio N, Doydora U, Harrison S, Herbohn J, Sebua J. 2009. Inventory and Assessment of Mother Trees of Indigenous Timber Species in Leyte Island and Southern Mindanao, Philippines. ACIAR Seedling Enhancement Project. (1): 113?125.

Henderson L. 2001. Alien Weeds and Invasive Plants. Plant Protection Research Institute Handbook No. 12. Cape Town, South Africa: Paarl Printers.

Hughes A. C. 2017a. Understanding the drivers of Southeast Asian biodiversity loss. Ecosphere 8: e01624.

Hughes A.C. 2017b. Mapping priorities for conservation in Southeast Asia. Biol Cons 209: 395-405.

Joppa LN, Pfaff A. 2011. Global protected area impacts. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 278(1712):1633-1638.

Kubitzki K, Kadereit JW. 2003. The Families and Genera of Flowering Plants: Volume I?VII, Springer?Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York, 1?469pp.

Madulid D. 1989. Biodiversity on Philippine Mountains. http://www.ched.gov.ph/wp?content/uploads/2013/05/CHED?00000004.pdf. Accessed 4 August 2016.

McGinley M. 2013. Biological Diversity of the Philippines. [WWW Document]. URL http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/150648/ (accessed 7.13.15).

Posa MRC, Diesmos AC, Sodhi NS, Brooks TM. 2008. Hope for threatened tropical biodiversity: Lessons from the Philippines. BioScience 58:231-240.

Rojo J. 1999. Revised Lexicon of Philippine Trees, Forest Products Research and Development Institute. Department of Science and Technology, College, Laguna.

Rojo JP, Aragones EG Jr. 1997. Botanical Identification Handbook on Philippine Dipterocarps, Forest Products Research and Development Institute. Department of Science and Technology, College, Laguna.

Salvaña FRP, Carillo CK, Mangaoang CC, Bretaña BL. 2019. Diversity and community structure of trees in two forest types in Mt. Apo Natural Park (MANP), Philippines. Biodiversitas 20(7): 1794-1801.

Salvaña FRP, Gruezo WS. 2018. Threatened species of genus Podocarpus in the Philippines. Asian Journal of Concervation Biology 7(2): 125-127.

Salvaña FRP, Gruezo WS, Hadsall AS. 2018. Recent taxonomic notes and new distribution localities of Podocarpus Pers. species in the Philippines. Sibbaldia: the Journal of Botanic Garden Horticulture No. 16: 99-120.

Tanalgo KC. 2017. Wildlife hunting by indigenous people in a Philippine protected area: a perspective from Mt. Apo National Park, Mindanao Island. J Threat Taxa 9(6): 10307-10313.

The Plant List (2016). http://www.theplantlist.org. Accessed 18 October 2015.

Turner IM, Corlett RT. 1996. The conservation value of small, isolated fragments of lowland tropical rain forest. Trends Ecol Evolut 11(8): 330-333.

Uriarte M. 2007. Some Introduced Alien Species in the Philippines and their Effects on Ecosystems. Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Document Repository. (1): 1-81.

Zamora PM. 1999. Inventory of Important Species. Mount Apo Foundation Inc. http://www.mafi.org.ph/information/featured_topics/ft_sub_04.html. Accessed 5 November 2016.