Tree diversity and carbon sequestration assessment using multiple methods in a dry evergreen forest restoration site, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand

Main Article Content

WARIS KAEWBANLAO
PASUTA SUNTHORNHAO
PICHIT LUMYAI

Abstract

Abstract. Kaewbanlao W, Sunthornhao P, Lumyai P. 2025. Tree diversity and carbon sequestration assessment using multiple methods in a dry evergreen forest restoration site, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand. Biodiversitas 26: 3886-3902. This study assessed the forest structure, tree diversity, and carbon sequestration in a Dry Evergreen Forest (DEF) restoration area (Forest Plantation Target 49: FPT 49) in Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand. The site contained 4,538 individual trees across 96 species, with a high tree density (1,512 stems ha-¹), basal area (130.84 m² ha-¹), and diversity (Simpson’s index: 0.90; Shannon-Wiener index: 3.02). Microcos tomentosa, Nephelium hypoleucum, and Dialium cochinchinense were the dominant species, with Fabaceae being the most species-rich family. Biomass and carbon sequestration were estimated using three methods. Wood volume-based estimation method used the Wood specific Density (WD) and Biomass Expansion Factors (BEFs) and resulted in the highest estimates (152.36 Mg ha-¹ of biomass; 71.61 Mg C ha-¹; 262.59 Mg CO? ha-¹), likely due to the inclusion of Biomass Expansion Factors (BEFs) and species-specific wood density. Method I yielded intermediate estimates, while Method II produced the lowest. Statistical analysis revealed that the DBH size class had the strongest effect on carbon sequestration (?²: 0.14), followed by its interaction with the method used (?²: 0.17), with significant differences observed across DBH classes and methods. Bland-Altman and boxplot analyses showed a strong agreement between the allometric method and the direct carbon method, but highlighted variability and potential overestimation by Method III, especially for trees with large DBH. Although carbon content estimates were lower than those found in old-growth forests, the results indicated substantial recovery in tree diversity and carbon stock 28 years post restoration. The study emphasizes the importance of method selection in estimating carbon sequestration and recommends integrating structural and ecological factors to enhance the accuracy of forest carbon accounting.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Adrah E, Wan Mohd JWS, Omar H, Bajaj S, Vieira LR, Mazlan SM, Silva CA, Ooi MCG, Mohd Said MN, Maulud KNA, Cardil A, Mohan M. 2022. Analyzing canopy height patterns and environmental landscape drivers in tropical forests using NASA’s GEDI spaceborne LiDAR. Remote Sens 14 (13): 3172. DOI: 10.3390/rs14133172.

Amorim LDM, Furtado De Sousa LO, Oliveira FFM, Camacho RGV, De Melo JIM. 2016. Fabaceae na Floresta Nacional (FLONA) de Assú, semiárido Potiguar, Nordeste do Brasil. Rodriguésia 67 (1): 105-124. DOI: 10.1590/2175-7860201667108.

Appanah S, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Regional Community Forestry Training Center for Asia-Pacific (Bangkok, Thailand). 2016. Forest Landscape Restoration for Asia-Pacific Forests. FAO and RECOFTC, Bangkok, Thailand.

Biaou S, Gouwakinnou GN, Noulèkoun F, Salako KV, Noumagnan NBA, Ahouandjinou EBO, Houehanou TD. 2023. Insights from analyzing local ecological knowledge and stand structure for guiding conservation actions for the endangered tropical tree Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir. Trees For People 14: 100447. DOI: 10.1016/j.tfp.2023.100447.

Biering-Sørensen F. 1984. Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period. Spine 9 (2): 106-119. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198403000-00002.

Chai Y, Yue M, Wang M, Xu J, Liu X, Zhang R, Wan P. 2016. Plant functional traits suggest a change in novel ecological strategies for dominant species in the stages of forest succession. Oecologia 180 (3): 771-783. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3483-3.

Chandaeng W, Puangchit L, Junkerd N, Jumwong N. 2020. Carbon stock of different forest communities at Wang Nam Khiao Forestry Research and Student Training Station, Nakhon Ratchasima Province. Thai J For 39 (1): 57-70.

Chanlabut U, Nahok B. 2022. Forest structure and carbon stock of Suan Phueng Nature Education Park in Ratchaburi Province, Western Thailand. Biodiversitas 23 (8): 4314-4321. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d230856.

Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairns MA, Chambers JQ, Eamus D, Fölster H, Fromard F, Higuchi N, Kira T, Lescure JP, Nelson BW, Ogawa H, Puig H, Riéra B, Yamakura T. 2005. Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145 (1): 87-99. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0100-x.

Chawa P, Nosaengsri M, Piankhit P, Phongkaranyapas K, Asanok L. 2025. Vegetation structure characteristics related to edaphic factors and carbon stock in Hin Tang Waterfall Recreational Forest, Udon Thani Province, Thailand. Thai J For 44 (1): 127-139.

Chen S, Woodcock C, Dong L, Tarrio K, Mohammadi D, Olofsson P. 2024. Review of drivers of forest degradation and deforestation in Southeast Asia. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ 33: 101129. DOI: 10.1016/j.rsase.2023.101129.

Chen Y, Zhang S, Wang Y. 2024. Spatial distribution patterns and drivers of above- and below-biomass in Chinese terrestrial ecosystems. Sci Total Environ 944: 173922. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173922.

Csillik O, Keller M, Longo M, Ferraz A, Pinagé ER, Görgens EB, Ometto JP, Silgueiro V, Brown D, Duffy P, Cushman KC, Saatchi S. 2024. A large net carbon loss attributed to anthropogenic and natural disturbances in the Amazon arc of deforestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 121 (33): e2310157121. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2310157121.

Curtis JT, McIntosh RP. 1950. The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology 31 (3): 434-455. DOI: 10.2307/1931497.

Dar AA, Babu KN, Dilshad K, Nath S, Parthasarathy N. 2023. Temporal changes in tree community structure and carbon stocks in a human-impacted tropical dry evergreen forest, South India. Acta Ecol Sin 43 (4): 701-711. DOI: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2022.09.002.

Daryaei A, Sohrabi H. 2016. Additive biomass equations for small diameter trees of temperate mixed deciduous forests. Scand J For Res 31 (4): 394-398. DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2015.1089932.

Delgado-Salinas A, Turley T, Richman A, Lavin M. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of the cultivated and wild species of Phaseolus (Fabaceae). Syst Bot 24: 438-460. DOI: 10.2307/2419699.

Diloksumpun S, Visaratana T, Panuthai S, Ladpala P, Janmahasatien S, Sumran S. 2005. Carbon cycling in the Sakaerat dry evergreen and the Maeklong mixed deciduous forests. Climate Change in the Forest Sector “The Potential of Forests to Support the Kyoto Protocol”. Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Bangkok, 4-5 August 2005. [Thai]

Doraisami M, Domke GM, Martin AR. 2024. Improving wood carbon fractions for multiscale forest carbon estimation. Carbon Balance Manag 19 (1): 25. DOI: 10.1186/s13021-024-00272-2.

Duangsathaporn K, Sangram N, Omule Y, Prasomsin P, Palakit K, Lumyai P. 2023. Formulating equations for estimating forest stand carbon stock for various tree species groups in Northern Thailand. Forests 14 (8): 1584. DOI: 10.3390/f14081584.

Eckstein D, Künzel V, Schäfer L. 2021. The Global Climate Risk Index 2021. Germanwatch, Bonn.

El Mderssa M, Belghazi B, Benjelloun H, Zennouhi O, Nassiri L, Ibijbijen J. 2019. Estimation of carbon sequestration using allometric equations in Azrou cedar forests (Cedrus atlantica Manetti) in the Central Middle Atlas of Morocco under climate change. Open J For 9 (3): 214-225. DOI: 10.4236/ojf.2019.93011.

Estoque RC, Ooba M, Avitabile V, Hijioka Y, Dasgupta Y, Togawa T, Nurayama Y. 2019. The future of Southeast Asia’s forests. Nat Commun 10 (1): 1829. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09646-4.

FAO, UNEP. 2020. The State of the World’s Forests 2020. Forests, Biodiversity and People, Rome.

Fayaz A, Chaudhary P, Mankotia S. 2025. Impacts of climate change on forest ecosystem dynamics and management strategies. Intl J Environ Clim Change 15 (1): 273-286. DOI: 10.9734/ijecc/2025/v15i14691.

Feng G, Huang J, Xu Y, Li J, Zang R. 2021. Disentangling environmental effects on the tree species abundance distribution and richness in a subtropical forest. Front Plant Sci 12: 622043. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.622043.

Frank J, Weiskittel A, Walker D, Westfall JA, Radtke PJ, Affleck DL, MacFarlane DW. 2019. Gaps in Available Data for Modeling Tree Biomass in the United States. USDA Forest Service, Pennsylvania. DOI: 10.2737/NRS-GTR-184.

Freitas TP, Oliveira JTDS, Paes JB, Vidaurre GB, Lima JL. 2019. Environmental effect on growth and characteristics of eucalyptus wood. Floresta Ambient 26 (4): e20160302. DOI: 10.1590/2179-8087.030216.

Gorgens EB, Henrique NM, Tobias J. 2020. L4B-Maximum Tree Height Map for the Brazilian Amazon: Version v1. Zenodo, Switzerland. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.4036988.

Gray AN. 2015. The role of old forests and big trees in forest carbon sequestration in the Pacific Northwest. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA (eds). Pushing Boundaries: New Directions in Inventory Techniques and Applications: Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Symposium 2015. USA, 8-10 December 2015.

Guo F, Yang Y, Gao G. 2024a. Climate change impact on three important species of wild fruit forest ecosystems: assessing habitat loss and climatic niche shift. Forests 15 (8): 1281. DOI: 10.3390/f15081281.

Guo P, Zhao X, Wang X, Feng Q, Li X, Tan Y. 2024b. Wood density and carbon concentration jointly drive wood carbon density of five Rosaceae tree species. Forests 15 (7): 1102. DOI: 10.3390/f15071102.

Harris N, Gibbs D. 2021. Forests Absorb Twice As Much Carbon As They Emit Each Year. World Resources Institute. https://wri.org/insights/forests-absorb-twice-much-carbon-they-emit-each-year.

Hop NV, Quy NV, Lam NV, Trong PT, Thinh PC. 2023. Woody plant diversity and aboveground carbon stock of Dipterocarpus chartaceus dominant forests in Binh Chau-Phuoc Buu Nature Reserve, South Vietnam. Asian J For 7 (2): 6. DOI: 10.13057/asianjfor/r070206.

Hu M, Wang Y, Li H, Hu L, Liu Q, Zhou F, Yang A, Yu F, Ouyang X. 2024. The impacts of tree species on soil properties in afforested areas: A case study in central subtropical China. Forests 15 (6): 895. DOI: 10.3390/f15060895.

Hussin YA. 2022. Assessment and modelling of forest biomass and carbon stock and sequestration using various remote sensing sensor systems. In: Suratman MN (eds). Concepts and Applications of Remote Sensing in Forestry. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore.

IPCC. 2006. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IGES, Hayama, Japan.

Jamil R, Akbar M, Imran M, Nageen S, Hafiz S, Muaza H, Rimsha J. 2024. Water quality and fish health: Interaction with toxic substances. In: Ijaz MU, Ehsan N, Imran M, Yousaf S (eds). Zoology: Advancements and Research Trends. FahumSci, Lahore, Pakistan.

Kajornsrichon S. 1988. Some Ecological Characteristics of Natural Pine Stands at Ban Wat Chan Royal Project, Amphoe Mae Chaem, Changwat Chiang Mai. [Thailand]

Komiyama A, Ong JE, Poungparn S. 2008. Allometry, biomass, and productivity of mangrove forests: A review. Aquat Bot 89 (2): 128-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.006.

Kamsanor S, Wachrinrat C, Marod D. 2022. Plant community comparison among man-made forest, secondary dry evergreen forest and natural dry evergreen forest at Pa Muak Lek-Tabkwang Plaeng 2 National Reserved Forest, Saraburi Province. Thai J For 32 (3): 12-21.

Koppad AG, Gowda GB, Rachana, Das A. 2024. Assessment of forest composition, structure and biomass dynamics using permanent plot inventories in Yellapur Forest Division, India. Intl J Environ Clim Change 14 (12): 342-359. DOI: 10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i124630.

Krejza J, Sv?tlík J, Bedná? P. 2017. Allometric relationship and Biomass Expansion Factors (BEFs) for above- and below-ground biomass prediction and stem volume estimation for ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and oak (Quercus robur L.). Trees 31 (4): 1303-1316. DOI: 10.1007/s00468-017-1549-z.

Kumar P, Dobriyal M, Kale A, Pandey AK, Tomar RS, Thounaojam E. 2022. Calculating forest species diversity with information-theory based indices using Sentinel-2A sensor’s of Mahavir Swami Wildlife Sanctuary. Plos One 17 (5): e0268018. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268018.

Kutintara U, Marod D, Takahashi M, Nakashizuka T. 1995. Growth and dynamics of bamboos in a tropical seasonal forest. The International Workshop on the Changes of Tropical Forest Ecosystems by El Niño and Others. National Research Council, Kanchanaburi, Thailand, 7-10 February 1995. [Thai]

Lee JM, Kim HS, Choi B. 2024. High variability in urban tree growth: necessity of size-dependent estimation with emphasis on large-diameter trees. Forests 15 (12): 2091. DOI: 10.3390/f15122091.

Lee JT, Chu MY, Lin YS, Kung KN, Lin WC, Lee MJ. 2020. Root traits and biomechanical properties of three tropical pioneer tree species for forest restoration in landslide areas. Forests 11 (2): 179. DOI: 10.3390/f11020179.

Lewis SL, Edwards DP, Galbraith D. 2015. Increasing human dominance of tropical forests. Science 349 (6250): 827-832. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa9932.

Li Y, Li J, Wei L. 2024. Stable reverse J-shaped diameter distribution occurs in an old-growth karst forest. J For Res 35 (1): 107. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-024-01763-1.

Liu H, Fu Y, Pan J, Wang G, Hu K. 2023. Biomass spatial pattern and driving factors of different vegetation types of public welfare forests in Hunan Province. Forests 14 (5): 1061. DOI: 10.3390/f14051061.

Loehle C, Miller DA, Kovach AI et al. 2024. Forest management is key for conserving biodiversity and providing ecosystem services in the United States. Forests 15 (12): 2087. DOI: 10.3390/f15122087.

Lutz JA, Furniss TJ, Johnson DJ et al. 2018. Global importance of large-diameter trees. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 27 (7): 849-864. DOI: 10.1111/geb.12747.

Ma Y, Zhang W, Jiang R, Jiang M, Ju J. 2025. Effects of stand structural characteristics, diversity, and stability on carbon storage across different densities in natural forests: A case study in the Xiaolong Mountains, China. Forests 16 (1): 71. DOI: 10.3390/f16010071.

Magurran AE. 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, US. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0.

Mahananda MR, Behera SK, Mohanty BP, Mishra S. 2021. Adsorption efficiency of Albizia lebbeck (Indian siris) as bio-adsorbent for quantitative removal of lead metal ion from contaminated waters. Appl Ecol Environ Sci 9 (10): 856-864. DOI: 10.12691/aees-9-10-2.

Mamonov D, Morkovina S, Matveev S, Sheshnitsan S, Ivetic V. 2022. Comparative evaluation of carbon sequestration accounting methods by pine-birch forest plantations in Voronezh region. For Eng J 12 (3): 4-15. DOI: 10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2022.3/1.

Marod D, Sungkaew S, Thinkampaeng. 2024. Natural tree regeneration after selective cutting in a dry evergreen forest in Northeastern Thailand. Biodiversitas 25 (11): 4074-4085. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d251107.

Meeussen C, Govaert S, Vanneste T. 2021. Drivers of carbon stocks in forest edges across Europe. Sci Total Environ 759: 143497. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143497.

Mildrexler DJ, Berner LT, Law BE, Birdsey RA, Moomaw WR. 2020. Large trees dominate carbon storage in forests east of the Cascade Crest in the United States Pacific Northwest. Front For Glob Change 3: 594274. DOI: 10.3389/ffgc.2020.594274.

Mir AH, Chaudhury G, Barbhuyan HSA, Sarma K, Upadhaya K. 2021. Impact of disturbance on community structure, biomass and carbon stock in montane evergreen forests of Meghalaya, Northeast India. Carbon Manag 12 (2): 215-233. DOI: 10.1080/17583004.2021.1899752.

Moreira AB, Gregoire TG, Do Couto HTZ. 2019. Wood density and carbon concentration of coarse woody debris in native forests, Brazil. For Ecosyst 6 (1): 18. DOI: 10.1186/s40663-019-0177-z.

Morgenroth J, Nowak D, Koeser A. 2020. DBH distributions in America’s urban forests, an overview of structural diversity. Forests 11 (2): 135. DOI: 10.3390/f11020135.

Murali A, Kasinathan S, Bhat K. 2023. Data from: Structure and Dynamics of Secondary and Mature Rainforests: Insights from South Asian Long-Term Monitoring Plots. Zenodo, Switzerland. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.10426971.

Mustamu S, Hatulesila JW, Mardiatmoko G. 2024. Pendampingan masyarakat desa hutan (binaan PT. WWI) dalam penerapan metode pengukuran cadangan karbon di Desa Wapsalit Kabupaten Buru. Maanu Jurnal Pengabdi Masyarakat 2 (1): 61-70. DOI: 10.30598/maanuv2i1p61-70. [Indonesian]

Mwakalukwa EE, Mwakisu A, Maliondo SMS. 2023. Woody species diversity, composition, structure and carbon storage of a dry evergreen montane forest of Essimingor Nature Forest Reserve in Tanzania. Intl J Trop Dryl 7 (1): 26-36. DOI: 10.13057/tropdrylands/t070104.

Mwaluseke ML, Mwakalukwa EE, Maliondo SMS. 2023. Vegetation composition, diversity, stand structure and carbon stock of a dry evergreen montane forest of Lendikinya Forest Reserve in Tanzania. Biodiversitas 24 (1): 551-562. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d240164.

Phetchaburi National Park Research And Development Center. 2019. Report of Study on Carbon Stocks in ASEAN Heritage Areas, Kaeng Krachan National Park, National Park Research Report 16. National Parks Research and Innovation Development Center, National Parks of Thailand, Petchaburi.

Neumann M, Moreno A, Mues V. 2016. Comparison of carbon estimation methods for European forests. For Ecol Manag 361: 397-420. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.11.016.

Ogawa H, Yoda K, Ogino K, Kira T. 1965. Comparative ecological studies on three main types of forest vegetation in Thailand. II. Plant biomass. Nat Life South East Asia 4: 49-80.

Oktan E, Atar N. 2023. The role of monumental trees in carbon storage. The 3rd International Congress on Engineering and Life Science. Turkey, 20-22 September 2023. DOI: 10.61326/icelis.2023.47.

Oluwajuwon TV, Ogbuka CE, Ogana FN, Hossain MS, Israel R, Lee DJ. 2024. Describing and modelling stem form of tropical tree species with form factor: A comprehensive review. Forests 16 (1): 29. DOI: 10.3390/f16010029.

Pasalodos-Tato M, Riballo EA, Montero G, Diaz-Balteiro L. 2017. Evaluation of tree biomass carbon stock changes in Andalusian forests: Comparison of two methodologies. Carbon Manag 8 (2): 125-134. DOI: 10.1080/17583004.2017.1306407.

Phumphuang W, Marod D, Sungkaew S, Thinkampaeng S. 2018. Forest dynamics and tree distribution patterns in dry evergreen forest, Northeastern, Thailand. Environ Nat Resour J 16: 58-67. DOI: 10.14456/ENNRJ.2018.15.

Phumphuang W, Sungkaew S, Wachrinrat C, Thinkampheang S, Hermhuk S, Thongsawi J. 2024. Environmental factors differentially influence species distributions across tree size classes in a dry evergreen forest in Sakaerat Biosphere Reserve, Northeastern Thailand. J For Res 29 (4): 297-305. DOI: 10.1080/13416979.2024.2314834.

Picard N, Fonton N, Bosela FB. 2025. Selecting allometric equations to estimate forest biomass from plot- rather than individual-level predictive performance. Biogeosciences 22 (5): 1413-1426. DOI: 10.5194/bg-22-1413-2025.

Poorter L, Van Der Sande MT, Thompson J. 2015. Diversity enhances carbon storage in tropical forests. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 24 (11): 1314-1328. DOI: 10.1111/geb.12364.

Pothong TES, Chairuangsri S, Chanthorn W, Shannon DP, Wangpakapattanawong P. 2022. New allometric equations for quantifying tree biomass and carbon sequestration in seasonally dry secondary forest in Northern Thailand. New For 53 (1): 17-36. DOI: 10.1007/s11056-021-09844-3.

Reyes G, Brown S, Chapman J, Lugo AE. 1992. Wood Densities of Tropical Tree Species. SO-GTR-88. USDA For Serv South For Exp Stn, New Orleans, LA. DOI: 10.2737/SO-GTR-088.

Rijal B, Sharma M. 2024. Modelling diameter at breast height distribution for eight commercial species in natural-origin mixed forests of Ontario, Canada. Forests 15 (6): 977. DOI: 10.3390/f15060977.

Rohmatiah A. 2017. Pendugaan biomassa dan kandungan karbon kawasan hutan rakyat wilayah kelola Forest Management Unit (FMU) Lawu Manunggal. In: Lukito M, RetnoIswati R, Rochidajah R (eds). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat. Pangkalpinang, 7 Oktober 2017. [Indonesian]

Rojas-Sandoval J, Datiles MJ, Acevedo-Rodríguez P. 2022. Albizia lebbeck (Indian siris). CABI Compendium 4008. DOI: 10.1079/cabicompendium.4008.

Sabhasri S, Wood LE. 1967. Forest Biomass in Thailand. Joint Thai-US Military Research and Development Centre, Bangkok.

Sahu SC, Suresh HS, Ravindranath NH. 2016. Forest structure, composition and above ground biomass of tree community in tropical dry forests of Eastern Ghats, India. Not Sci Biol 8 (1): 125-133. DOI: 10.15835/nsb819746.

Sandal N. 2024. Global warming: A comprehensive analysis of causes, impacts, and solutions. Intl J Glob Res Innov Technol 2 (4): 70-78. DOI: 10.62823/IJGRIT/2.4.7010.

Sarkissian AJ, Kutia M. 2024. Editorial: Sustainable forest management under climate change conditions-a focus on biodiversity conservation and forest restoration. Front For Glob Change 7: 1533425. DOI: 10.3389/ffgc.2024.1533425.

Setyasih DMD, Putei RAS, Raharjo YAA, Izdihar RS, Kusumaningrum L, Setyawan AD. 2025. Potential aboveground carbon storage in the community forest area of Tawangmangu, Karanganyar District, Indonesia. Asian J For 9 (1): 111. DOI: 10.13057/asianjfor/r090111.

Sieosathanakul A, Sunthornhao P, Teejuntuk S. 2023. Forecasting the carbon sequestration of system of intensive forestation at the Wang Chan Forest Learning Center, Rayong Province. Thai J For 42 (2): 13-24.

Simpson EH. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163 (4148): 688. DOI: 10.1038/163688a0.

Singh R, Pandey R. 2024. Underlying plant trait strategies for understanding the carbon sequestration in Banj Oak forest of Himalaya. Sci Total Environ 919: 170681. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170681.

Singh B, Reddy VM, Reddy KR, Sharma P, Nautiyal, Bhatnagar S, Islam R, Alabdeli. 2024. Modeling the impact of deforestation on global warming using system dynamics. E3S Web Conf 581: 01023. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202458101023.

Smitinand T. 2014. Thai Plant Names. Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Thailand.

Stibig HJ, Achard F, Carboni S, Raši R, Miettinen J. 2014. Change in tropical forest cover of Southeast Asia from 1990 to 2010. Biogeosciences 11 (2): 247-258. DOI: 10.5194/bg-11-247-2014.

Suwannapinunt W. 1983. A study on the biomass of Thyrsostachys siamensis Gamble forest at Hin-Lap, Kanchanaburi. J Bamboo Res 2: 82-101.

Tange T, Ge F. 2020. Topographic factors and tree heights of aged Cryptomeria japonica plantations in the Boso Peninsula, Japan. Forests 11 (7): 771. DOI: 10.3390/f11070771.

Teegalapalli K, Pandey CK, Osuri AM, Ratnam J, Sankaran M. 2019. Understanding the variation in wood densities of trees and its implications for carbon assessments. bioRxiv 523480. DOI: 10.1101/523480.

Thammanu S, Han H, Marod D, Srichaichana J, Chung J. 2021. Above-ground carbon stock and REDD+ opportunities of community-managed forests in Northern Thailand. PLos One 16 (8): e0256005. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256005.

Thongnun J, Lumyai P, Suksard S, Sriarkarin S. 2022. Forest dynamics and carbon stock over a 10-year period at Lam Nam Nan National Park in Uttaradit and Phrae Provinces. Thai J For 41 (2): 48-62.

Tohirin T, Suryanto P, Sadono R. 2021. Vegetation structure, aboveground biomass, and carbon storage of Wono¸ a local forest management in Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, across three geomorphological zones. Biodiversitas 22 (8): 3207-3218. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d220814.

Tsutsumi T, Yoda K, Sahunalu P, Dhanmanonda P, Prachaiyo B. 1983. Forest: Felling, burning and regeneration. In: Kyuma K, Pairitra C (eds). Shifting Cultivation. Natural Science, Tokyo.

Udayakumar M, Izayas JE. 2025. Biomass stockpile of trees in tropical dry evergreen forests, Peninsular India. Curr World Environ 20 (1): 65-76. DOI: 10.12944/CWE.20.1.6.

Ung CH, Lambert MC, Raulier F, Guo J, Bernier PY. 2017. Biomass of trees sampled across Canada as part of the Energy from the Forest Biomass (ENFOR) Program. [Dataset]. https://doi.org/10.23687/fbad665e-8ac9-4635-9f84-e4fd53a6253c.

Uttaruk Y, Khoa PV, Laosuwan T. 2024. A guideline for greenhouse gas emission reduction and carbon sequestration in forest sector based on Thailand Voluntary Emission Reduction Programme. Sains Malays 53 (3): 477-486. DOI: 10.17576/jsm-2024-5303-01.

Vallet L, Schwartz M, Ciais P, Wees AV, Truchis A, Mouillot. 2023. High-resolution data reveal a surge of biomass loss from temperate and Atlantic pine forests, contextualizing the 2022 fire season distinctiveness in France. Biogeosciences 20 (18): 3803-3825. DOI: 10.5194/bg-20-3803-2023.

Villanova PH, Torres CMME, Jacovine LAG et al. 2018. Prognosis of the diameter distribution and carbon stock in a secondary Atlantic forest by Markov chain. SciELO J 42 (2): 7244231. DOI: 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.7244231.

Viriyabuncha C, Na Nakorn T, Prommin K, Srisakorn K. 2014. Forest resource inventory I: Assessment of carbon sequestration in forest areas. In: Lakanaworakul R (eds). Global Warming Learning Set, REDD Plus and Forest Environment, No. 2. Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Bangkok.

Vorster AG, Evangelista PH, Stivall AE, Ex S. 2020. Variability and uncertainty in forest biomass estimates from the tree to landscape scale: the role of allometric equations. Carbon Balance Manag 15 (1): 8. DOI: 10.1186/s13021-020-00143-6.

Wang S, Yang H, Koirala S, Forkel M, Reichstein M, Carvalhais N. 2023. Understanding disturbance regimes from patterns in forest biomass. ESSOAr Preprint. DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10512199.3.

Wang Z, Wang G, Li Y, Zhang Z. 2024. Determinants of carbon sequestration in thinned forests. Sci Total Environ 951: 175540. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175540.

Wayson CA, Johnson KD, Cole JA, Olguín MI, Carrillo OI, Birdsey RA. 2015. Estimating uncertainty of allometric biomass equations with incomplete fit error information using a pseudo-data approach: methods. Ann For Sci 72 (6): 825-834. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-014-0436-7.

Zhang H, Feng Z, Chen P, Chen X. 2019. Development of a tree growth difference equation and its application in forecasting the biomass carbon stocks of Chinese forests in 2050. Forests 10 (7): 582. DOI: 10.3390/f10070582.

Zhao J, Liu D, Zhu Y, Peng H, Xie H. 2022. A review of forest carbon cycle models on spatiotemporal scales. J Clean Prod 339: 130692. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130692.

Zhao L, Xiang W, Li J, Deng X, Fang X, Peng C. 2015. Effects of topographic and soil factors on woody species assembly in a Chinese subtropical evergreen broadleaved forest. Forests 6 (3): 650-669. DOI: 10.3390/f6030650.

Zhou H, Liu W, Boeck HJD, Ma Y, Zhang Z. 2025. Improving total carbon storage estimation using multi-source remote sensing. Forests 16 (3): 453. DOI: 10.3390/f16030453.

Most read articles by the same author(s)