Economic value assessment of edible plants in Muang District, Kalasin Province, Thailand

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

NATTHAKIT PHATLAMPHU
SURAPON SAENSOUK
PIYAPORN SAENSOUK
AUEMPORN JUNSONGDUANG
AHMAD DWI SETYAWAN

Abstract

Abstract. Phatlamphu N, Saensouk S, Saensouk P, Junsongduang A, Setyawan AD. 2023. Economic value assessment of edible plants in Muang District, Kalasin Province, Thailand. Biodiversitas 24: 3960-3967. Edible plants have been traded as economic plants for food consumption, and their supply can be used at the industry level. However, modern agriculture might be disrupting a local plant value that the indigenous people use as their food in daily life. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the economic value of edible plants in Muang District, Kalasin Province, based on their market value and trading volume in a year. Data were collected through a pricing survey in the municipal and local markets from March 2019 to February 2021. The value was applied using the formula of the economic Value of Edible Plants (EVEP) that focus on the local scale of economy to explore the relationships between edible plant traders and consumers in the study area. There were 78 edible plant species that belonged to 67 genera and 41 families. The highest value is Oryza sativa L. (rice) which gains income averaging 684,000 THB annually/trader, followed by Coriandrum sativum L. (coriander) and Alpinia galanga (L.) Willd. (galangal) with averaging values of 216,000 and 187,200 THB annually/trader, respectively. When we identified the edible plants into two groups based on their sources, including the economic plants and the local plants, they were found 40 species of economic plants (51%) and 38 species of local plants (49%). In addition, we found that 43 species of edible plants were traded throughout the year (12 months), including 14 species of local plants (32.6%) and 29 species of economic plants (67.4%). That shows the risk trend of local plant consumption loss is due to the growth of economic plants.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Agarwal R, Chandra V. 2019. Diversity of wild edible plants in the Mandal-Chopta forest, Uttarakhand. J Med Plants Stud 7 (1): 89-92. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35479.83368.
Bhatia H, Sharma YP, Manhas RK, Kumar K. 2018. Traditionally used wild edible plants of district Udhampur, J&K, India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 14 (1): 73. DOI: 10.1186/s13002-018-0272-1.
Choenkwan S, Fox JM, Rambo AT. 2014. Agriculture in the mountains of Northeastern Thailand: Current situation and prospects for development. Mt Res Dev 34 (2): 95-106. DOI: 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-13-00121.1.
Cruz-Garcia GS, Struik PC, Johnson DE. 2016. Wild harvest: Distribution and diversity of wild food plants in rice ecosystems of Northeast Thailand. NJAS-Wagening J Life Sci 78: 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.njas.2015.12.003.
Gwalwanshi DR, Vyas D, Bishwas AJ, Salunkhe O, Tiwari P. 2014. Ethnomedicinal and ecological studies on Fabaceae of Runj Forest Panna (Mp), India. Intl J Recent Sci Res 5 (7): 1264-1269.
Heywood VH. 2011. Ethnopharmacology, food production, nutrition and biodiversity conservation: Towards a sustainable future for indigenous peoples. J Ethnopharmacol 137 (1): 1-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.05.027.
Hosseini SH, Bibak H, Ghara AR, Sahebkar A, Shakeri A. 2021. Ethnobotany of the medicinal plants used by the ethnic communities of Kerman province, Southeast Iran. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 17 (1): 31. DOI: 10.1186/s13002-021-00438-z.
Junsongduang A, Kasemwan W, Lumjoomjung S, Sabprachai W, Tanming W, Balslev H. 2020. Ethnomedicinal knowledge of traditional healers in Roi Et, Thailand. Plants 9 (9): 1177. DOI: 10.3390/plants9091177.
Kalasin provincial office SIPD. 2019. General Information on Kalasin. Strategy and Information for Provincial Development Unit (SIPD), Provincial Governor's Office. Kalasin.http://www.kalasin.go.th.
Kew Science. 2022. World Checklist of Selected Plant families (WCSP). http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/.
Mici? D, Ostoji? S, Pezo L, Blagojevi? S, Pavli? B, Zekovi? Z, ?urovi? S. 2019. Essential oils of coriander and sage: Investigation of chemical profile, thermal properties and QSRR analysis. Ind Crops Prod 138: 111438. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.06.001.
Moksia F, Yougouda M, Flore NJ, Konsala S, Tchobsala, Didier DS, Louis Z, Marie MP. 2019. Diversity and socio-economic value of wild edible plants the Mounts Mandara Region, Cameroon. Intl J Sci 8 (10): 13-25. DOI: 10.18483/ijSci.2168.
Mullalija B, Mustafa B, Hajdari A, Quave CL, Pieroni A. 2021. Ethnobotany of rural and urban Albanians and Serbs in the Anadrini region, Kosovo. Genet Resour Crop Evol 68 (5): 1825-1848. DOI: 10.1007/s10722-020-01099-9.
Muthayya S, Sugimoto JD, Montgomery S, Maberly GF. 2014. An overview of global rice production, supply, trade, and consumption. Ann NY Acad Sci 1324: 7-14. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12540.
Nabi G, Walmsley A, Liñán F, Akthar I, Neame C. 2018. Does entrepreneurship education in the first year of higher education develop entrepreneurial intentions? The role of learning and inspiration. Stud High Educ 43 (3): 452-467. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2016.1177716.
Numpulsuksant W, Saensouk S, Saensouk P. 2021. Diversity and ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Ban Hua Kua, Kae Dam District, Thailand. Biodiversitas 22 (10): 4349-4357. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d221027.
Oladeji OS, Adelowo FE, Oluyori AP. 2021. The genus Senna (Fabaceae): A review on its traditional uses, botany, phytochemistry, pharmacology and toxicology. S Afr J Bot 138: 1-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2020.11.017.
Panyadee P, Balslev H, Wangpakapattanawong P, Inta A. 2019. Medicinal plants in homegardens of four ethnic groups in Thailand. J Ethnopharmacol 239: 111927. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2019.111927.
Phatlamphu N, Saensouk S, Saensouk P, Junsongduang A. 2021. Ethnobotany of edible plants in Muang District, Kalasin Province, Thailand. Biodiversitas 22 (12): 5432-5444. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d221226.
Pholhiamhan R, Saensouk S, Saensouk P. 2018. Ethnobotany of Phu Thai ethnic group in Nakhon Phanom Province, Thailand. Walailak J Sci Technol 15 (10): 679-699. DOI: 10.48048/wjst.2018.3737.
Rahman AHMM, Parvin MIA. 2014. Study of medicinal uses on Fabaceae family at Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Res Plant Sci 2 (1): 6-8. DOI: 10.12691/plant-2-1-2.
Saensouk S, Saensouk P, Pasorn P, Chantaranothai P. 2016. Diversity and uses of Zingiberaceae in Nam Nao National Park, Chaiyaphum and Phetchabun provinces, Thailand, with a new record for Thailand. Agric Nat Resour 50 (6): 445-453. DOI: 10.1016/j.anres.2016.08.002.
Saisor N, Prathepha P, Saensouk S. 2021. Ethnobotanical study and utilization of plants in Khok Nhong Phok forest, Kosum Phisai District, Northeastern Thailand. Biodiversitas 22 (10): 4336-4348. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d221026.
Susandarini R, Khasanah U, Rosalia N. 2021. Ethnobotanical study of plants used as food and for maternal health care by the Malays communities in Kampar Kiri Hulu, Riau, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 22 (6): 3111-3120. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d220613.
Sutjaritjai N, Wangpakapattanawong P, Balslev H, Inta A. 2019. Traditional uses of Leguminosae among the Karen in Thailand. Plants 8 (12): 600. DOI: 10.3390/plants8120600.
Thongpukdee A, Thepsithar C, Thammaso C. 2014. Ethnobotanical survey of vegetable plants traditionally used in Kalasin Thailand. World Acad Sci Eng Technol-Intl J Bioeng Life Sci 8 (7): 692-695. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1093834.
Zhang L, Chai Z, Zhang Y, Geng Y, Wang Y. 2016. Ethnobotanical study of traditional edible plants used by the Naxi people during droughts. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 12: 39. DOI: 10.1186/s13002-016-0113-z.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >>