Community stance towards sloth bear (Melursus ursinus) conservation in Odisha, India

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

PRAKASH C. MARDARAJ
TARA J. PIRIE
JANMEJAY SETHY
SATYARANJAN BEHERA

Abstract

Abstract. Mardaraj PC, Pirie TJ, Sethy J, Behera S. 2023. Community stance towards sloth bear (Melursus ursinus) conservation in Odisha, India. Biodiversitas 24: 2521-2526. The human dimension is an essential component of extensive carnivore management and conservation. People living in bear habitats often fear encounters with these animals, and negative interactions can significantly affect people's livelihoods, attitudes, and tolerance toward the conservation initiatives of bears. To investigate the effect of such interactions on people's attitudes and livelihoods, we surveyed 510 households through semi-structured interviews located around five reserve forests of the Nilgiri wildlife range in a coastal district of Odisha, India. Gender, education, dependency on the forest, and specifics of bear encounters were the parameters taken to know the villagers' attitudes toward bear conservation. The average age of respondents was 46 (17-88) years; 78.8% (n= 402) were male. There are 37.5% of the respondents below the poverty level with annual incomes less than $ 514 USD. The majority of respondents, 85%, showed favorable opinions regarding sloth bears (Melursus ursinus Shaw, 1791), with only 15% expressing a negative perception. Bears were encountered by 87% of the total participants, with 45% encountering a sloth bear weekly. The study identified that 82.9% of villagers were more likely to state sloth bears were problematic rest disagreed with it. The educated interviewer was strongly supporting bear conservation in that landscape. The perspectives of the villagers and their experiences on their adverse feeling toward the bears need to minimize through suggested participatory and community-based mitigation strategies for long time conservation of the sloth bear in the landscape.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Bruskotter J, Wilson R. 2014. Determining where the wild things will be: Using psychological theory to find tolerance for large carnivores. Conserv. Lett. 7 (3): 158–165. DOI:10.1111/conl.12072
Campbell?Smith G, Simanjorang HV, Leader?Williams N, Linkie M. 2010. Local attitudes and perceptions toward crop?raiding by orangutans (Pongo abelii) and other nonhuman primates in northern Sumatra, Indonesia. Am. J. Primatol. 72(10): 866-876. DOI:10.1002/ajp.20822
Can, ÖE, D'Cruze N, Garshelis DL, Beecham J, Macdonald DW. 2014. Resolving Human?Bear Conflict: A Global Survey of Countries, Experts, and Key Factors. Conserv. Lett. 7(6): 501–513. DOI:10.1111/conl.12117
Carter NH, Riley SJ, Liu J. 2012. Utility of a psychological framework for carnivore conservation. Oryx. 46(4):525-535. DOI: 10.1017/S0030605312000245
Carter NH, Riley SJ, Shortridge A, Shrestha, BK, Li J. 2014. Spatial assessment of attitudes toward tigers in Nepal. Ambio, 43: 125–137. DOI:10.1007/s13280-013-0421-7
Casey AL, Krausman PR, Shaw WW, Shaw HG. 2005. Knowledge of and attitudes toward mountain lions: A public survey of residents adjacent to Saguaro National Park, Arizona. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 10(1): 29–38. DOI:10.1080/10871200590904860
Champion HG, Seth SK. 1968. A revised survey of the forest types of India. Manager of Publications, Govt. of India Press, New Delhi. 404.
Davenport M, Nielsen CK, Mangun JC. 2010. Attitudes toward mountain lion management in the Midwest: implications for a potentially recolonizing large predator. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 15 (5):373-388. DOI:10.1080/10871209.2010.507564.
Dharaiya N, Bargali HS, Sharp T. 2020. Melursus ursinus (amended version of 2016 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland Switzerland. e. T13143A166519315. 10.2305/IUCN. UK.
Dickman AJ, Hazzah L, Carbone C, Durant SM. 2014. Carnivores, culture and ‘contagious conflict’: Multiple factors influence perceived problems with carnivores in Tanzania’s Ruaha landscape. Bio. Consev. 178: 19-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.07.011
Dickman AJ, Macdonald EA, Macdonald DW. 2011. A review of financial instruments to pay for predator conservation and encourage human–carnivore coexistence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Aug 23;108(34):13937-44. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1012972108
Fritts SH, Stephenson RO, Hayes RD, Boitani L. 2003. Wolves and humans. In: D.L. Mech and L. Boitani (Eds.), Wolves: Behavior, ecology and conservation. Chicago, IL and London, UK: The University of Chicago Press. 289–316
Gore, M. L. (2004). Comparison of Intervention Programs Designed to Reduce Human-Bear Conflict: A Review of the Literature.
Government of Odisha. 2012. Statistical Abstract of Odisha. Government of Odisha, India: Directorate of Economics and Statistics. http://www.desorissa.nic.in/latest_publications.html.
Government of Orissa. 2010. Economic Survey, 2009- 10. Planning and Co-ordination Department, and Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Government of Orissa, Bhubaneswar. Link: http://14.139.60.153/handle/123456789/9466
Graham K, Beckerman AP, Thirgood S. 2005. Human–predator–prey conflicts: Ecological correlates, prey losses and patterns of management. Biol. Conserv. 122 (2): 159–171. DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.06.006
Harada K. 2003. Attitudes of local people towards conservation and Gunung Halimun National Park in West Java, Indonesia. J. Forest Res. 8 (4):271-282. DOI:10.1007/s10310-003-0037-z
Hazzah L, Mulder MB, Laurence F. 2009. "Lions and warriors: social factors underlying declining African lion populations and the effect of incentive-based management in Kenya." Biol. Conserv. 142 (11): 2428-2437. DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.03.015
Joydeep P, Sahu PC. 2019. Delineation of Ground Water Potential Zones in Nilagiri Block of Baleswar District, Odisha: A Remote sensing and GIS Approach, Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR). 6 (2) 542-550
Kaczensky P, Blazic M, Gossow H. 2004. Public attitude towards brown bears (Ursus arctos) in Slovenia. Biol. Conserv. 118 (5):661–674. DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2003.10.015
Lindsey PA, Du Toit JT, Mills MGL. 2005. Attitudes of ranchers towards African wild dogs Lycaon pictus: Conservation implications on private land. Bio. Conserv. 125 (1): 113–121. DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.03.015
Lustig N, Kanpur R. 2017. World Development Report: Attacking Poverty. World Bank. 2000-2001, World Development Report: Attacking Poverty. World Bank, Washington DC. [Report] Oxford University Press. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.25723.11041
Mallik RM, Panigrahi N. 1998 "Study of Domestic and Commercial use including Marketing of NTFPs." [Research Report] submitted to SCC, Scandia Consult Natura, [Sweden]
Mallik RM. 2000. Sustainable management of non-timber forest products in Orissa: Some issues and options. Ind. Jn. of Agri. Econ;55(3):384-97.
Mardaraj P, Debata S, Swain KK. 2012. Sloth bears prey on domestic animals in response to habitat degradation in Eastern India. Intl. Bear News 21:18-19.
Mardaraj P, Dutta SK. 2011. Human-Sloth Bear Conflict in Balasore Forest Division, Eastern India, A Case Study in Human Dominated Landscape, LAP Lambert Academic Publishing GmbH & Co. KG. 116.
Mardaraj P. 2014. A sloth bear rescued from retaliation killing in eastern India. International Bear News.23(2):16–17.
Mardaraj, PC. 2015. Identifying key issues for conservation of sloth bear (Melursus ursinus) in Rajnilgiri, Odisha, Eastern India. Report submitted to The Rufford Small Grant Foundation, United Kingdom.
Mishra R. 2004. Developmental perspectives of traditional and modern institutions in a tribal community of Orissa a study of santals and their development in Mayurbnhanj district. [PhD thesis]. Department of Political Science, Utkal University: Bhubaneshwar. An unpublished PhD thesis that we referred to at the Library of Utkal University, Bhubaneswar, [India]. 60–91.
Nayak NC, Bhagirath B, Mishra P. 2009. "Appraisal of processes and procedures of NREGS in Orissa: a study of Mayurbhanj and Balasore District." [Project Report] Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India. https://im4change.org/docs/838NREGA-study-mayurbhanj-balasore-district.pdf
Oli MK, Taylor KR, Rogers ME. 1994. Snow leopard (Panthera uncia) predation of livestock: An assessment of local perceptions in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Bio. Conserv. 68 (1): 63–68. DOI:10.1016/0006-3207(94)90547-9
Quigley H, Herrero S. 2005. Characterization and prevention of attacks. People and Wildlife, Conflict or Co-existence? 9:27. In: Woodroffe R, Thirgood S, Rabinowitz A, (eds). People and wildlife, conflict or co-existence?. Cambridge University Press.
Redpath SM, Young J, Evely A, Adams WM, Sutherland WJ, Whitehouse A, Amar A, Lambert RA, Linnell JD, Watt A, Gutierrez RJ. 2013. Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends in ecology & evolution. 28(2): 100-109. DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.021
Sathyakumar S, Kaul R, Ashraf NVK, Mookerjee A, Menon V. 2012. National bear conservation and welfare action plan. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Wildlife Institute of India and Wildlife Trust of India, Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India.
Scherl LM, Wilson A, Wild R, Blockhus J, Franks P, McNeely JA, McShane TO. 2004. Can Protected Areas Contribute to Poverty Reduction? Opportunities and Limitations. Chief Scientist’s Office Report, IUCN, Gland. Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.viii+60pp
Schröder J, Kahlke V, Staubach KH, Zabel P, Stüber F. 1998. Gender differences in human sepsis. Archives of surgery. 133(11): 1200-1205. DOI:10.1001/archsurg.133.11.1200
Sillero-Zubiri C, Laurenson MK. 2001. Interactions between carnivores and local communities: conflict or co-existence? Conservation Biology Series – Cambridge-. Jan 1:282-312.
Singh N, Sonone S, Dharaiya N. 2018. Sloth bear attacks on humans in central India: implications for species conservation. Human–Wildlife Interactions.12(3):5. DOI:10.26077/2mgq-fs29
Sripal RT. 2015. Understanding stakeholders’ perception towards human-wildlife interaction and conflict in a tiger landscape-complex of India. [Dissertation] Masters Theses. University of Massachusetts Amherst, 298. https://doi.org/10.7275/7533319
Teel TL, Krannich RS, Schmidt RH. 2002. Utah stakeholders' attitudes toward selected cougar and black bear management practices. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 30(1): 2–15. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3784630. Accessed 16 Mar. 2023.
Treves A, Karanth KU. 2003. Human-carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide. Conserv. Biol. 17(6):1491–1499. DOI:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00059.x
Treves A. 2009. Hunting for large carnivore conservation. J Appl Ecol. 46 (6): 1350-1356. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01729.x
USAID. 2006. Issues in Poverty Reduction and Natural Resource Management. United States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC.
Van Eeden LM, Eklund A, Miller JR, López-Bao JV, Chapron G, Cejtin MR, Crowther MS, Dickman CR, Frank J, Krofel M, Macdonald DW. 2018. Carnivore conservation needs evidence-based livestock protection. PLoS biology. 16(9): e2005577. DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.2005577
Vucetich JA, Macdonald DW. 2017. "Some essentials on coexisting with carnivores." Open Access Government. Aug 216-217.
Williams C, Ericsson G, Heberlein TA. 2002. A quantitative summary of attitudes toward wolves and their reintroduction (1972–2000). Wildlife Society Bulletin. 30(2): 575–584. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3784518. Accessed 16 Mar. 2023.
Woodroffe R, Thirgood S, Rabinowitz A. 2005. The impact of human-wildlife conflict on natural systems. In: Woodroffe R, Thirgood S, Rabinowitz A, (eds) People and Wildlife: Conflict or Coexistence? Cambridge University Press, New York. 1–12.