Phylogenetic of red snapper (Lutjanidae) in Yapen Island Waters, Papua, Indonesia

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

RIDWAN SALA
ARADEA BUJANA KUSUMA
BAYU PRANATA

Abstract

Abstract. Sala R, Kusuma AB, Pranata B. 2022. Phylogenetic of red snapper (Lutjanidae) in Yapen Island Waters, Papua, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 23: 6428-6436. Red snappers are an economically valuable fishery resource. Most of these snapper species are inhabitants of coral reef ecosystems. A variety of red snapper species can be found in the northern waters of Papua, particularly in the Yapen Regency. However, information regarding the biological and ecological aspects of these fish is virtually unavailable. On the other hand, the utilization intensity of red snapper as a source of community income continues to increase. By using DNA barcode sequences, this study attempted to examine species diversity and relationships among Lutjanidae family species. The study was carried out from June to August 2022 in the waters of Yapen Regency by taking fish samples from the fish caught by local hand-lining fishers. Red snapper samples were identified morphologically and molecularly. According to molecular analyses, it was identified nine red snapper species from the genera of Lutjanus, Aphareus and Pristipomoides. The morphological characteristics of the species from the genus of Aphareus are similar to those from the genus of Pristipomoides yet different from those of the species from the genus of Lutjanus. The phylogenetic tree consisted of four clades with significant bootstrap values ranging from 98 to 99%. Clades 1, 2 and 3 comprise the species from the genus of Lutjanus, while clade 4 contains species from the genera of Aphareus and Pristipomoides. The greatest genetic distance was found between Lutjanus fulvus and Pristipomoides multidens, while the smallest genetic distance was found between Lutjanus vitta and Lutjanus ehrenbergii. Based on the study results, some management implications are discussed. For example, information on species biodiversity maps is needed to determine the target stock of a managed species so that management objectives are more focused on the species level and not on the genus or family level.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Allen GR. 1985. FAO Species Catalogue. Vol. 6. Snappers of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of lutjanid species known to date. FAO Fish. Synop. 125(6):208 p. Rome: FAO. (Ref. 55) http://www.fao.org/docrep/009/ac481e/ac481e00.htm
Allen GR, White WT, Erdmann MV. 2013. Two new species of snappers (Pisces: Lutjanidae: Lutjanus) from the Indo-West Pacific. Journal of the Ocean Science Foundation 6: 33-51. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1036813
Bakar AA, Adamson EAS, Juliana LH, Mohd SAN, Wei-Jen C, Man A, Naim Md D. 2018. DNA barcoding of Malaysian commercial snapper reveals an unrecognized species of the yellow-lined Lutjanus (Pisces:Lutjanidae). PLoS ONE 13(9):e0202945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202945
Chan AHE, Chaisiri K, Saralamba S, Morand S, Thaenkham U. 2021. Assessing the suitability of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA genetic markers for molecular systematics and species identification of helminths. Parasites & Vectors 14 (1):233 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04737-y
Dwifajri, Tapilatu RF, Pranata B, Kusuma AB. 2022. Molecular phylogeny of grouper of Epinephelus genus in Jayapura, Papua, Indonesia inferred from Cytochrome Oxidase I (COI) gene. BIODIVERSITAS 23 (3): 1449-1456. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d230332
Fadli N, Mohd Nor SA, Othman AS, Sofyan H, Muchlisin ZA. 2020. DNA barcoding of commercially important reef fishes in Weh Island, Aceh, Indonesia. PeerJ 8:e9641. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9641.
Gold JR, Willis SC, Renshaw MA, Buentello A, Walker JrHJ, Puritz JB, Hollenbeck CM, Voelker G. 2015. Phylogenetic relationships of tropical eastern Pacific snappers (Lutjanidae) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Systematics and Biodiversity 13(6): 596-607. DOI: 10.1080/14772000.2015.1078857
Gupta A, Bhardwaj A, Supriya, Sharma P, Pal Y, Mamta, Kumar s. 2015. Mitochondrial DNA- a Tool for Phylogenetic and Biodiversity Search in Equines. J Biodivers Endanger Species S1: S1.006. doi:10.4172/2332-2543.S1-006
Grover A, Sharma PC. 2016. Development and use of molecular markers: past and present. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 36(2): 290-302. DOI:10.3109/07388551.2014.959891
Heino M. 2014. Quantitative Traits. In: Cadrin SX, Karr LA, Mariani S (eds) Stock Identification Methods: Applications in Fishery Science. 2nd Edition. Academic Press – Elsevier, London, UK.
Hutubessy, BG, and JW Mosse. 2015. Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management in Indonesia: Review on Indicators and Reference Values. Procedia Environmental Sciences 23:148-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.01.023
Howell, D, AM Schueller, JW Bentley, A Buchheister, D Chagaris, M Cieri, K Drew, MG Lundy, D Pedreschi, DG Reid, and H Townsend. 2021. Combining Ecosystem and Single-Species Modeling to Provide Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management Advice within Current Management Systems. Frontiers in Marine Science 7
Hassana HU, Mawac Z, Ahmadd N, Zulfiqare T, Sohailf M, Ahmadg H, Yaqoobg H, Bilalh M, Rahmanc MA, Ullahi N, Hossainc MY, Habibj A, Araik T. 2022. Size at sexual maturity estimation for 36 species captured by bottom and mid-water trawls from the marine habitat of Balochistan and Sindh in the Arabian Sea, Pakistan, using maximum length (Lmax) and logistic (L50) models. Brazilian Journal of Biology 84: e262603. | https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.262603
Halim LJ, Rahim I, Mahboob S, Al-Ghanim KA, Amat A, Naim DMd. 2022. Phylogenetic relationships of the commercial red snapper (Lutjanidae sp.) from three marine regions. Journal of King Saud University – Science 34: 101756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101756
Iwatsuki Y, Tanaka F, Allen GR. 2015. Lutjanus xanthopinnis, a new species of snapper (Pisces: Lutjanidae) from the Indo-west Pacific, with a redescription of Lutjanus madras (Valenciennes 1831), (Valenciennes). Journal of the Ocean Science Foundation 17: 23-42. Available online at http://www.oceansciencefoundation.org/josf/josf17c.pdf
Jarvis PD, Holland BR, Sumner, JG. 2017. Phylogenetic Invariants and Markov Invariants. ReferenceModule in Life Sciences. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.06903-X
Mous PJ, Gede WBI, Pet JS. 2021. Guide to length-based assessments of fisheries targeting snappers, groupers and emperors in Indonesia, with size composition of sampled fish. Yayasan Konservasi Alam Nusantara and People and Nature Consulting, Jakarta Indonesia. Report. AR_ASSESSMENTGUIDE_130722
Moore B, Colas B. 2016. Identification guide to the common coastal food fishes of the Pacific Island region. New Caledonia: Pacific Community.
Patwardhan A, Ray S, Roy A. 2014. Molecular Markers in Phylogenetic Studies – A Review. J Phylogen Evolution Biol 2: 131. doi:10.4172/2329-9002.1000131
Pentinsaari M, Salmela H, Mutanen M, Roslin T. 2016. Molecular evolution of a widely-adopted taxonomic marker (COI) across the animal tree of life. Sci Rep 6 (35275). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35275
Pei N, Chen B, Kress WJ. 2017. Advances of community-level plant DNAbarcoding in China. Front. Plant Sci 8: 225. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2017.00225
Ramos LM, Chazot N, Sihvonen P, Ounap E, Jiang N, Han H, Clarke JT, Davis RB, Tammaru T, Wahlberg N. 2021. Molecular phylogeny, classification, biogeography and diversificationpatterns of adiverse group of moths (Geometridae: Boarmiini). Mol Phylogenet Evol162: 107198. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2021.107198
Staples D, Brainard R, Capezzuoli S, Funge-Smith S, Grose C, Heenan A, Hermes R, Maurin P, Moews M, O’Brien C, Pomeroy R. 2014. Essential EAFM. Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management Training Course. Volume 1 – For Trainees. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand, RAP Publication 2014/13, 318pp.
Shimose T, Nanami A. 2014. Age, growth and reproductive biology of blacktail snapper, Lutjanus fulvus, around the Yaeyama Islands, Okinawa, Japan. Ichthyological Research 61(4):322-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10228-014-0401-3.
Souza AS, Dias Júnior EA, Perez MF, Cioffi MB, Bertollo LAC, Garcia-Machado E, Vallinoto MNS, Galetti PM Jr, Molina WF. 2019. Phylogeography and Historical Demography of Two Sympatric Atlantic Snappers: Lutjanus analis and L. jocu. Front. Mar. Sci 6:545. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00545
Shuai F, Yu S, Lek S, Li X. 2018. Habitat effects on intra-species variation in functional morphology: Evidence from freshwater fish. Ecol Evol 8:10902-10913. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4555
Shan B, Liu Y, Yang C, Zhao Y, Zhang G, Wu Q, Sun D. 2021. DNA Barcoding of Fish in Mischief Reef-Fish Diversity of a Reef Fish Community from Nansha Islands. Front. Mar. Sci. 7:618954. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2020.618954
Taylor BM, Oyafuso ZS, Pardee CB, Ochavillo D, Newman SJ. 2018. Comparative demography of commercially-harvested snappers and an emperor from American Samoa. PeerJ 6:e5069. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5069.
Toha AHA, Dailami M, Anwar S, Setiawan JB, Jentewo Y, Lapadi I, Sutanto S, Aryasari R, Ambariyanto, Runtuboi F, Madduppa H. 2020. The genetic relationships and Indo-Pacific connectivity of whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) with particular reference to mitochondrial COI gene sequences from Cendrawasih Bay, Papua, Indonesia. BIODIVERSITAS 21 (5): 2159-2171. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d210544
Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Bronwyn HI, Peter RL, Hebert PDN. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B Biological Sciences 360 (1462): 1847-57. Available from: doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1716
White WT, Last PR, Dharmadi, Faizah R, Chodrijah U, Prisantoso BI, Pogonoski JJ, Puckridge M, Blaber SJM. 2013. Market fishes of Indonesia (Jenis-jenis ikan di Indonesia). Canberra, Australia: ACIAR Monograph No. 155. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
Zou Z, Zhang J. 2016. Morphological and molecular convergences in mammalian phylogenetics. Nature Communications 7:12758. Available online at https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms12758

Most read articles by the same author(s)