The bioecological features of some species of the Cupressaceae introduced in the conditions of Tashkent City, Uzbekistan
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Issue
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Abstract. Temirov EE, Rakhimova NK. 2022. The bioecological features of some species of the Cupressaceae introduced in the conditions of Tashkent City, Uzbekistan. Biodiversitas 23: 5532-5538. For the first time, monitoring of the current state of previously introduced 19 species and 10 forms of the Cupressaceae family was carried out. Four species and five forms selected among them are distinguished by high decorativeness. The studied species and forms differ in the duration of the virginal period. Under the conditions of Uzbekistan, in forms of the genus Platycladus it lasts 4-5 years, in forms of the genus Thuja - 6-8 years, in the genera Chamaecyparis and Juniperus 6-9 years. The maximum growth and development indices under the conditions of Tashkent were observed in Platycladus orientalis f. compacta (East Asia), and the smallest ones are found in Chamaecyparis lawsoniana (North America) and Juniperus squamata (Western China). Seed germination in forms of the genus Platycladus under laboratory conditions is 56-78% (optimal temperature 20-22°C), in forms of the genus Thuja 31-46%, in Chamaecyparis lawsoniana - 21% (optimal temperature 28-29°C), the maximum rate of seed germination in the field was noted in Platycladus orientalis f. compacta (90-95%), and the minimum is Chamaecyparis lawsoniana (6-8%). For the first time, the possibility of vegetative reproduction in open ground with a rooting rate of cuttings up to 95% has been shown. Vegetative propagation gives effective results compared to a seed. For the first time in Uzbekistan, such a study was conducted on conifers, until now, no one has previously studied the biological characteristics of Conifers within the country.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
References
REFERENCES
Adams R.P., Farhat P., Lulëzim Sh., Siljak-Yakovlev S. 2018. Discovery of Juniperus sabina var. balkanensis R. P. Adams and A. N. Tashev in Albania and relictual polymorphisms found in nrDNA. 100 (3). Phytologia 100(2).
Akimov I.S. 1997. The meaning of green spaces // Natural resources of the Oryol region. Eagle: Orlistat. ??. 94-98.
Aleksandrova M.S. 2009. Ornamental conifers for the collection MBG / problems of modern dendrology: proceedings of the international. nauch. Conf. – M. ??. 11-13.
Boraty?ski A., Wachowiak W., Dering M., Boraty?ska K. 2014. The biogeography and genetic relationships of Juniperus oxycedrus and related taxa from the Mediterranean and Macaronesian regions. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 174(4). DOI:10.1111/boj.12147
Chuprina P.Ya. 1980. Gymnosperms // Trees and shrubs of decorative urban plantings of Polesie and Forest-steppe of the Ukrainian SSR. Kiev: Naukova Dumka. Pp. 19-44.
Diez A., Romo M., Boraty?ski A., Hidalgo O., Sobierajska K. 2012. Genome size and ploidy levels in highly fragmented habitats: The case of western Mediterranean Juniperus (Cupressaceae) with special emphasis on J. thurifera L. Tree Genetics & Genomes 9 (2). DOI:10.1007/s11295-012-0581-9.
Boraty?ski A., Jasi?ska A.K., Marcysiak K., Mazur M. 2013. Morphological differentiation supports the genetic pattern of the geographic structure of Juniperus thurifera (Cupressaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 299 (4). DOI:10.1007/s00606-013-0760-7
Esipova T.V. 2004. Results of the introduction of gymnosperms in Uzbekistan half a century //Development of Botanical science in Central Asia and its integration into production. Materials of the international scientific conference. Tashkent. Pp. 329-331.
Farhat P., Siljak-Yakovlev S., Adams R., Dagher M.B., Robert Kh. 2019. Genome size variation and polyploidy in the geographical range of Juniperus sabina L. (Cupressaceae). May Botany Letters 166(2):1-10. DOI:10.1080/23818107.2019.1613262
Gadek P.A., Quinn C.J. 1993. An analysis of relationships within the Cupressaceae based on L. sequences. Annalsofthe Missouri Botanical Garden 80: ??. 581-586.
Gerasimov A.O. 2003. Stability of coniferous species in street plantings of St. Petersburg: / Gerasimov. St. Petersburg. 181 p.
Goncharova O.A. 2005. Differentiated assessment of the phenological development of dendrointroducts in a consecutive series of growing seasons on the Kola Peninsula //Biology: science of the XXI century: theses. 9th Pushchino School-conf. of young scientists. – Pushchino. P. 325.
Hartman H., Kester D. 2002. Propagation of plants // a Practical guide for professionals and Amateurs. Moscow: Tsentropoligraf. 363 p.
Hojjati F., Sereshti H., Hojjati M. 2019. Leaf essential oils and their application in systematics of Juniperus excelsa complex in Iran. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 84:29-34. DOI:10.1016/j.bse.2019.03.004
Jimenez J.F., Gómez P.S., Cánovas J.L., Hensen I. 2017. Influence of natural habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of Canarian populations of Juniperus turbinata. Silva Fennica 51(2). DOI:10.14214/sf.1678
Kabanov N.E. 1977. Coniferous trees and shrubs of the Far East. Moscow: Nauka. 176 p.
Kangshan M., Gang H., Jianquan L. 2010. Diversification and biogeography of Juniperus (Cupressaceae): variable diversification rates and multiple intercontinental dispersals // New Phytologist. 188. ??. 254–272.
Kharrat M.B. 2020. First evidence for allotriploid hybrids between Juniperus thurifera and J. sabina in a sympatric area in the French Alps. Annals of Forest Science 77(4). DOI:10.1007/s13595-020-00969-7
Krechetova N.V., Sokolova N.A., Kotova L.I. 2000. About decorative forms the Western arborvitae and cypress gorkovskogo // Lesnoy Zhurnal. No. 5. ??. 91-95.
Lapin P.I., Sidneva S.V. 1973. Assessment of the prospects for the introduction of woody plants according to visual observations // The experience of the introduction of woody plants. M.: SBS of the USSR Academy of Sciences. ??. 7-80.
Lebreton Ph. 2014. La chimiotaxonomie des Gymnospermes. Bulletin – Societe Botanique de France 137(1):35-46. DOI:10.1080/01811797.1990.10824864
Long L., Jian-H., Steven R. 2018. Manchester Cupressaceae fossil remains fromthe Paleocene of Carneyville, Wyoming // Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 25. ??. 1–13.
Ma?gorzata M. 2021. Differentiation of Mediterranean species of Juniperus from the Sabina section as a result of their migrations. Plant and Fungal Systematics 66 (2):141-154. DOI:10.35535/pfsyst-2021-0013
Matyukhin D.L. 2000. features of the structure of the shoots from the decorative forms of the genera Thuja and Chamaecyparis Spach L. Moscow. Vol. 272. ??. 9-12.
Mazur M., Minissale P., Sciandrello S., Boraty?ski A. 2016. Morphological and ecological comparison of populations of Juniperus turbinata Guss. and J. phoenicea L. from the Mediterranean region. Plant Biosystems. 150(2):313-322. DOI:10.1080/11263504.2014.994579
Mazur M., Zielinska M., Boraty?ska K., Diez A. 2018. Taxonomic and geographic differentiation of Juniperus phoenicea agg. based on cone, seed, and needle characteristics. Systematics and Biodiversity 16(5):1-14. DOI:10.1080/14772000.2018.1439120
Mingazheva A.M. 2017. Methodological guide on the introduction of tree and shrub species. Ufa. 74 p.
Molchanov A.A., Smirnov V.V. 1967. Methods of studying the growth of woody plants. Moscow. 95 p.
Montserrat S.C., Romo A., Mazur M., Zieli?ska M., Minissale P., Dönmez A., Boraty?ska K., Boraty?ski A. 2021. Past, present, and future geographic range of the relict Mediterranean and Macaronesian Juniperus phoenicea complex //Ecology and Evolution 11(3) DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7395
Olson M. 2013. Cupressaceae // The Cypress Family. Spring, 2013. ??. 22-30.
Pinna M.S., Oscar G., Mattana E., Eva M. 2014. Cañadas Inter- and intraspecific morphometric variability in Juniperus L. seeds (Cupressaceae). Systematics and Biodiversity 12(2). DOI:10.1080/14772000.2014.904827
Sanguin H., Mathaux C., Frederic G., Prin Y. 2016. Ecology of vertical life in harsh environments: The case of mycorrhizal symbiosis with secular cliff climbing trees (Juniperus phoenicea L.) Journal of Arid Environments 134:132-135. DOI:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.07.008
Scale L.P., Samoshenkov E.G. 2002. Propagation of plants from softwood cuttings. Moscow. ?. 110.
Schulz C., Knopf P., Stützel Th. 2005. Identification key to the Cypress family (Cupressaceae). Weinheim. ??. 96-146.
Shtonda N.I. 2012. Evaluation of decorative woody plants of various biomorphs // Actual problems of plant ecology. Mat. Rep. of scientific conf. Tashkent, 2012. pp. 157-159.
Shtonda N.I. 2016. Introduction assessment of new ornamental woody plants. In: introduction assessment and biology of seed reproduction of new promising species of ornamental and medicinal plants. Research report on the project F5-FA-0-12154. Tashkent. Pp. 33-38.
Slavkina T.I. 1966. The study of basic biological patterns in the ontogenesis of conifers (methodology) // Introduction and acclimatization of plants. – Issue 4. Tashkent. ??. 54-62.
Slavkina T.I. 1968. Gymnosperms. Tashkent: Fan. Pp. 327-435.
Smagulova A., Uakhit R., Kiyan V. 2022. First Record of Alternaria alternata causing necrosis of Thuja (Thuja occidentalis) in Kazakhstan. Plant Disease. DOI:10.1094/PDIS-11-21-2523-PDN
Sobierajska K., Boraty?ska K., Jasi?ska A.K., Dering M. 2016. Effect of the Aegean Sea barrier between Europe and Asia on differentiation in Juniperus drupacea (Cupressaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 180(3). DOI:10.1111/boj.12377
Srivastava A., Prasad B., Rutumbara J., Rishi Srivastava D.R. 2022. Thuja occidentalis: an Unexplored Phytomedicine with Therapeutic Applications. Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening 25. DOI:10.2174/1386207325666220308153732
Suchkova G.A. 2002. Stability of coniferous wood species in the conditions of technogenic pollution of Voronezh: Abstract. diss. cand. biol. nauk. – Voronezh. 23 p.
Surso M.V. 2013. Morphogenesis and phenorhythmics of female reproductive structures of common juniper in the northern taiga // Lesovedenie. Moscow. No. 2. Pp. 58-64.
Torchik V.I., Antonyuk E.D., Edith V.V. 2007. Decorative garden forms of coniferous plants. Minsk. 152 p.
Valiev F.F. 2002. Molded variety of Thuja Western is in the collection of the Ufa Botanical garden // Actual problems of biology and ecology: proceedings of the IX scientific youth conference. Syktyvkar. Pp. 27-28.
Vildanova K.D. 1994. Introduction study of Pinus L. species in the Botanical Garden of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan // Diss. for the degree of Candidate of Sciences. biol. nauk. Tashkent. ?p. 9-30.
Yang Z., Yang Y., Rushforth K. 2021. Lectotypification of Chamaecyparis hodginsii of the Cupressaceae. PhytoKeys 185(2):117-122. DOI:10.3897/phytokeys.185.75796
Zaremuk R.S., Hupov R.B. 2018. Method of integrated varietiesassessment of genus Thuja L. DOI:10.30679/2219-5335-2018-2-50-180-190