Expression of heterosis, heterobeltiosis, and gene action in quantitative characters on soybean (Glycine max)

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

AYDA KRISNAWATI
MOCHAMMAD MUCHLISH ADIE

Abstract


Abstract. Krisnawati A, Adie MM. 2022. Expression of heterosis, heterobeltiosis, and gene action in quantitative characters on soybean (Glycine max)Biodiversitas 231745-1751Most soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) varieties have been created by crossing two or more parental genotypes. The study aimed to quantify the value of heterosis, heterobeltiosis, the degree of dominance as well as the gene action of the agronomic characters of F1 plants derived from the four soybean cross combinations. All the parents and crosses were evaluated in the screen house of the Indonesian Legume and Tuber Crops Research Institute (Malang, East Java, Indonesia) during 2021. The estimation for mid-parent heterosis (hMP), high-parent heterosis or heterobeltiosis (hHP), degree of dominance, and gene action was done for sevenquantitative characters (plant height, number of branches, number of nodes, number of filled pods, number of empty pods, weight of 10 seeds, and seed yield). The performance of the quantitative characters differs among cross combinations. The estimated value of heterosis mid-parent (hMP) for F1 crosses from four parental combinations ranged from -61.20 to 27.57, heterobeltiosis (hHP) ranged from -71.17 to 9.84, and the degree of dominance ranged from -6.45 to 19.40. The crosses of Derap 1 × Gepak Kuning and Dering 1 × Gepak Kuning showed a positive hMP and hHP for seed yield character. Thus, these hybrids could be used to develop high-yielding varieties with desirable traits in soybean. Seed yield character in the cross of Derap 1 × Gepak Kuning exhibited the overdominance type of gene action, meanwhile, the Dering 1 × Gepak Kuning was incomplete dominance.


##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Adsul AT, Chimote VP, Deshmukh MP, Thakare DS. 2016. Genetic analysis of yield and its components in soybean. SABRAO J Breed Genet 48(3): 247-57.
Burton JW, Brownie C. 2006. Heterosis and inbreeding depression in two soybean single crosses. Crop Sci 46: 2643–2648. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2006.03.0156.
Fujimoto R, Uezono K, Ishikura S, Osabe K, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES. 2018. Recent research on the mechanism of heterosis is important for crop and vegetable breeding systems. Breed Sci 68(2):145-158. DOI:10.1270/jsbbs.17155.
Ghazy UM, Fouad TA. 2021. Modifications of heterobeltiosis, heterosis, and hybrid vigour over check parent formulae to enhance judgment on hybrids. Int J Indust Entomol 42(2): 33-45. DOI:10.7852/ijie.2021.42.2.33.
Hayes HK, Immer FR, Smith DC. 1955. Method of Plant Breeding. Mc. Graw Hill Book Co. Inc, New York.
Ibrahim SAELK, Abdelsatar MA, Ahmed MAER, Niazy MM. 2021. Genetic behavior for seed yield and yield components in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) under normal irrigation and water stress conditions. Peruv J Agron 5(1): 1-17. DOI:10.21704/pja.v5i1.1656.
Ismail S, Khan FA, Mubarak S, Kanwal B. 2020. Heterosis in relation to combining ability studies in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)?. J Genet Genom Plant Breed 4(2): 68–75.
Jeeva G, Saravanan K, Sowmiya CA. 2020. Assessment of combining ability and standard heterosis through diallel analysis in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Electron J Plant Breed 11(2): 386–391. DOI:10.37992/2020.1102.068.
Kepildek R, Ceyhan E. 2018. Determination of some agronomic traits of fresh bean parents and hybrids and their heritability with diallel analysis method. Selcuk J Agric Food Sci 35(2):71-82. DOI:10.15316/SJAFS.2021.23.
Krisnawati A, Adie MM. 2018. Heterosis, heterobeltiosis, and gene action of several agronomic characters of soybean. In: Pratiwi H, Sulistyo A, Lestari SAD, Sari KP, Kristiono A, Rahajeng R. Proceeding of National Seminar on Legume and Tuber Crops. Indonesian Center for Food Crops Research and Development, Malang, 26 July 2017. [Indonesian]
Nehra A, Gothwal DK, Jeeterwal RC, Puniya SS, Gupta D, Ahmad S. 2021. The study of heterosis for seed yield and its attributes in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) under normal environmental conditions of Rajasthan. Pharma Innov J 10(10): 175-179.
Otusanya, GO, Chigeza G, Chander S. 2020. Combining ability of selected soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] parental lines. Indian J Agric Res. DOI:10.18805/IJARe.A-638.
Perez PT, Cianzio SR, Palmer RG. 2009. Evaluation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] F1 hybrids. J Crop Improv 23(1): 1-18. DOI:10.1080/15427520802417832.
Petr dan Frey Petr, F. C and K.J. Frey. 1966. Genotypic, correlation, dominance and heritabi-lity of quantitative character in oats. Crop Sci.6: 259-262.DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600030013x.
Rialch I, Dev J, Kumar B. 2017. Heterosis and combining ability studies for quality traits in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 6(8): 3443-3451. DOI:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.608.413.
Rocha GAF, Pereira FAC, Vello NA. 2018. Potential of soybean crosses in early inbreeding generations for grain yield. Crop Breed Appl Biotech 18: 267-275. DOI:10.1590/1984- 70332018v18n3a40.
Said AA. 2014. Generation mean analysis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under drought stress conditions. Annals Agric Sci 59(2): 177-184. DOI: 10.1016/j.aoas.2014.11.003.
Samant P, Singh K, Puspendra, Tiwari G. 2014. Heterosis studies in soybean Glycine max (L) Merrill. Intl J Basic Appl Agric Res 12(2): 0972-8813. DOI:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.608.413.
Sen TMA. 2020. Generation mean analysis for seed yield and its components of some quantitative characters on soybean crosses. J Plant Prod 11(7): 587-593. DOI:10.21608/jpp.2020.110546.
Tampha S, Jeberson MS, Sastry EVD, Shashidhar KS, Sharma PR. 2018. Line × tester analysis for yield and its contributing characters in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Pharma Innov J 7(9): 104-109.
Tamüksek S, Ceyhan E. 2020. Determination of characteristics of dry bean lines hybridized by line × tester method and the effect of heredity. Turkish J Agric Nat Sci 7(1): 157–164. DOI:10.30910/turkjans.680042.
Umar FA, Mohammed MS, Oyekunle M, Usman IS, Ishaq MN, Dachi SN. 2017. Estimates of combining ability for resistance to pod shattering in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) genotypes. J Plant Breed Crop Sci 9(12): 217-223. DOI:10.5897/JPBCS2017.0684.
Verma AK, Mehta AK, Singh RP, Singh PP, Sharma D. 2020. Studies on hybrid vigour for yield and contributing traits in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). Res J Biotech 15(10): 72-79.
Waghmode BD, Kore AB, Navhale VC, Sonone NG, Bhave SG. 2017. Heterosis for pod yield and its component traits in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Electron J Plant Breed 8(4): 1140-1147. DOI:10.5958/0975-928X.2017.00166.1.
Waly FA, Ibrahim RA. 2021. Combining ability and genetic variance components of yield and yield components in F1 and F2 diallel crosses of soybean. J Plant Prod 12(4): 437-448.
Yamgar SV, Pawar SV, Chimote VP, Deshmukh MP, Shinde GC, Nimbalkar CA. 2021. Expression of heterosis, residual heterosis and specific combining ability in yield and yield contributing characters of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). J Pharmacogn Phytochem10(1): 2711-2714.