Preferences, use, and value of forest products in Bardia National Park, Nepal
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract. Acharya KR, Devkota BP, Silwal T. 2026. Preferences, use, and value of forest products in Bardia National Park, Nepal. Asian J For 10 (1): r100119. https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjfor/r100119. Agrarian communities living near protected areas, especially in developing countries worldwide, are highly dependent on park resources to meet their subsistence needs. Buffer zones, in and around protected areas, are established to achieve dual aims: fulfilling local communities’ forest needs and conserving biodiversity. This study investigates the community preferences, uses, and values of park resources in the buffer zone of the Bardia National Park, Nepal. A household survey (n=531) of ten buffer-zone community forest user groups from November 2023 to February 2024, supplemented by direct observation of the khar-khadai (i.e., grass cutting) event in 2024. Logistic regression and chi-square test (χ²) were used to identify possible socioeconomic and institutional factors that affected households’ interest in extracting park resources. The results reveal that 63.7% of respondents showed an interest in collecting forest products, with significant differences by ethnicity (β = 0.399, p < 0.001) and community forest membership (β=-0.152, p<0.010). Tharu and disadvantaged Dalit households showed greater interest in accessing park resources than other ethnic groups. Forest users from buffer-zone community forests with better forest conditions (χ²=95.233, df=9, p<0.001) showed lower interest in entering the national park. Fuelwood was identified as the most preferred forest product, followed by thatch grass, grass cane and Sabai grass. Timber was found to be the least preferred forest product collected from the national park. Despite increased availability of alternatives, forest product collection from national parks remained significant for Tharu and Dalit households, for whom buffer-zone community forests could not meet the demand. This study recommends that sustainable forest management practices be promoted in buffer-zone community forests to address the unmet needs of local users by maintaining equitable access to resources and promoting alternative resources.
Article Details
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Acharya KR, Parajuli R, Devkota BP, Silwal T. 2025. Buffer zone community forestry in Nepal: Achievements, challenges, and governance implications. Intl J For Res 2025: 7727845. https://doi.org/10.1155/ijfr/7727845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/ijfr/7727845
Baral N, Heinen JT. 2007. Decentralization and people's participation in conservation: A comparative study from the Western Terai of Nepal. Intl J Sustain Dev World Ecol 14 (5): 520-531. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500709469751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500709469751
Bardia National Park (BNP). 2022. Management Plan of Bardia National Park and Its Buffer Zone (2079/80-2083/84). Bardia National Park Office, Thakurdwara Bardia.
Bardia National Park (BNP). 2024. Annual Report. Bardia National Park Office, Thakurdwara Bardia.
Bowler DE, Lisette M, Buyung-Ali LM, Healey JR, Jones JPG, Knight TM, Andrew S, Pullin AS. 2012. Does community forest management provide global environmental benefits and improve local welfare? Front Ecol Environ 10 (1): 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1890/110040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/110040
Brown K. 1998. The political ecology of biodiversity, conservation and development in Nepal's Terai: Confused meanings, means and ends. Ecol Econ 24 (1): 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(97)00587-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00587-9
Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS). 2021. District Profile of Bardia District. Central Bureau of Statistics. Statistics Office, Banke Nepalgunj, Nepal.
Cox T. 1990. Land rights and ethnic conflict in Nepal. Econ Polit Wkly 25 (24/25): 1318-1320.
Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC). 1999. Buffer Zone Management Guidelines. Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Babarmahal Kathmandu, Nepal.
Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC). 2022. Protected Area Management Strategy 2022-2030. Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Babarmahal Kathmandu, Nepal.
Forest Resource Assessment (FRA). 2015. State of Nepal’s Forests. Forest Resource Assessment. Department of Forest Research and Survey, Kathmandu, Nepal
Hanson JH. 2025. Access to assets and influence: Governance and livelihoods in Protected Areas of the Annapurna and Everest Regions, Nepal. Hum Ecol 53: 1069-1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-025-00643-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-025-00643-4
Hegde R, Enters T. 2000. Forest products and household economy: A case study from Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary Southern, India. Environ Conserv 27 (3): 250-259. https://doi.org/10.1017/s037689290000028x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S037689290000028X
Heinen JT, Baral N, Paudel PK, Sah JP. 2019. On the road to sustainability? A review of a half-century of biodiversity conservation successes in Nepal and some thoughts on future needs. In: Bakar AN, Suratman MN (eds.). Protected Areas, National Parks and Sustainable Future. Intech Open, London. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84617
His Majesty’s Government of Nepal (HMGN). 1973. National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act 1973 (4th Amendment in 1993). His Majesty’s Government of Nepal.
His Majesty’s Government of Nepal (HMGN). 1996. Buffer Zone Management Regulations 1996. His Majesty’s Government of Nepal.
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). 2021. Rangelands Atlas. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Karanth KK, Curran LM, Reuning-Scherer JD. 2006. Village size and forest disturbance in Bhadra Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats, India. Biol Conserv 128 (2): 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.024
Karki ST. 2013. Do protected areas and conservation incentives contribute to sustainable livelihoods? A case study of Bardia National Park, Nepal. J Environ Manag 128: 988-999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.054
Kumar R, Shahabuddin G. 2005. Effects of biomass extraction on vegetation structure, diversity, and composition of forests in Sariska Tiger Reserve, India. Environ Conserv 32 (3): 248-259. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892905002316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892905002316
Lamichhane B, Karki JB, Thapa SK, Bhandari A, Basyal B. 2024. Effect of cutting and burning on grassland habitat in Bardia National Park, Nepal. Ecosphere 15 (9): e70004. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70004
Lehmkuhl JF, Upreti RK, Sharma UR. 1988. National parks and local development: grasses and people in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Environ Conserv 15 (2): 143-148. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892900028952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900028952
Luintel H, Dhakal B. 2002. Marketing of Non-timber Forest Products of Banke and Bardia. Forest Resources Studies and Action Team, Ekantakuna, Lalitpur. https://forestaction.org.
Ministry of Forests and Environment (MoFE). 2020. Current Status of Community-based Forest Management Models in Nepal. Ministry of Forests and Environment, Kathmandu.
Mushi H, Yanda PZ, Kleyer M. 2020. Socioeconomic factors determining the extraction of non-timber forest products on the slopes of Mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Hum Ecol 48 (6): 695-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020-00187-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020-00187-9
Ndo EGD, Mvondo EA, Kaldjob CB, Eyi CM, Sonfo AN, Dongmo M, Fouda T, Toda M. 2024. Socioeconomic factors influencing the gathering of major non-timber forest products around Nki and Boumba-Bek National Parks, Southeastern Cameroon. For Policy Econ 168: 103293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103293
Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB). 2024. Foreign Exchange Rates. Nepal Rastra Bank, Kathmandu. https://www.nrb.org.np.
Oldekop JA, Holmes G, Harris WE, Evans KL. 2016. A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas. Conserv Biol 30 (1): 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12568
Peet NB, Watkinson AR, Bell DJ, Kattel BJ. 1999. Plant diversity in the threatened Sub-tropical Grasslands of Nepal. Biol Conserv 88 (2): 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3207(98)00104-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00104-9
Rai RK, Dhakal A, Khadayat MS, Ranabhat S. 2017. Is collaborative forest management in Nepal able to provide benefits to distantly located users?. For Policy Econ 83: 156-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.004
Straede S, Helles F. 2000. Park-people conflict resolution in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal: Buying time at high cost? Environ Conserv 27 (4): 368-381. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892900000424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900000424
Suleiman MS, Wasonga VO, Mbau JS, Suleiman A, Elhadi YA. 2017. Non-timber forest products and their contribution to household’s income around Falgore Game Reserve in Kano, Nigeria. Ecol Process 6 (1): 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-017-0090-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-017-0090-8
Thapa S, Chapman DS. 2010. Impacts of resource extraction on forest structure and diversity in Bardia National Park, Nepal. For Ecol Manag 259 (3): 641-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.11.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.11.023
Thapa S, Hubacek K. 2011. Drivers of illegal resource extraction: An analysis of Bardia National Park, Nepal. J Environ Manag 92 (1): 156-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.021
Thing SJ, Poudel BS. 2017. Buffer zone community forestry in Nepal: Examining tenure and management outcomes. J For Livelihood 15 (1): 57-70. https://doi.org/10.3126/jflv15i1.23096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/jfl.v15i1.23096
Upadhyaya SK, Musters CJM, Lamichhane BR, De Snoo GR, Dhakal M, De Iongh HH. 2020. Determining the risk of predator attacks around protected areas: The case of Bardia National Park, Nepal. Oryx 54 (5): 670-677. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605318001436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001436