Morphology and habitat of wild tea Gaultheria cumingiana in Mountain Province, Philippines

Main Article Content

JULIE P. GARSI
LICHELYN M. NASUNGAN
ALEXANDER T. BALDIC
ROLANDO TAWANNA JR.
JOYCE D. CUYANGOAN
EPIPHANIA MAGWILANG
EDGAR G. CUE
BRENT JOSEPH D. BANGAO

Abstract

Abstract. Garsi JP, Nasungan LM, Baldic AT, Tawanna Jr. R, Cuyangoan JD, Magwilang E, Cue EG, Bangao BJD. 2026. Morphology and habitat of wild tea Gaultheria cumingiana in Mountain Province, Philippines. Asian J For 10 (1): r100133. https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjfor/r100133. Gaultheria cumingiana is an important indigenous wild tea species valued in Mountain Province, Philippines, for its aroma, flavor, and medicinal properties. This study aimed to characterize the morphology and habitat features of G. cumingiana and assess the relationship between key soil properties and the plant's essential morphological characteristics. A descriptive quantitative research design was employed across five distinct locations in Bontoc and Barlig, Mountain Province. At each site, ten individual plants were sampled (N = 50 total). Data collection included morphometric and reproductive morphology, as well as soil variables. One-way ANOVA, DMRT, and Pearson r test were utilized to analyze data. The results showed that G. cumingiana was a small, aromatic shrub, exhibiting significant site-based variation in growth with an overall mean of 1.07 m, meanwhile the mean Apical Dominance Index (ADI) ranged from 7 to 14, p<0.05, and the leaf area had an overall mean of 10.89 cm2. Reproductive morphology showed highly significant differences for the number of flowers per peduncle and fruit weight, while not significant for corolla diameter. Soil analysis revealed not significantly different and moderately acidic with the overall mean 5.65, while the % moisture content is highly significant (mean 37.9%). Analysis established a significant negative correlation between soil N concentration and measured leaf area (mean 10.89), indicating that it develops smaller leaves in challenging environments. The species is a strong candidate for focused conservation, sustainable wild tea production, and domestication due to its inherent resilience.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Morphology and habitat of wild tea Gaultheria cumingiana in Mountain Province, Philippines. (2026). Asian Journal of Forestry, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjfor/r100133

References

Abdusalam A, Li Q. 2018. Morphological plasticity and adaptation level of distylous Primula nivalis in a heterogeneous alpine environment. Plant Divers 40 (6): 284-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2018.11.003.

Ackerson J. 2018. Soil Sampling Guidelines. Purdue University, West Lafayette. https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/AY/AY-368-W.pdf.

Agrawal AA, Fishbein M. 2006. Plant defense syndromes. Ecology 87 (7): S132-S149. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[132:PDS]2.0.CO;2.

Alfag J, Napaldet J. 2022. Taxonomic and ecological notes on Gaultheria cumingiana S. Vidal (Ericaceae) from the Cordillera Central Range, Northern Philippines. Taiwania 67 (4): 497-509. https://doi.org/10.6165/tai.2022.67.497.

Bae E, Jin E, Bae J, Lee K, Choi S. 2016. Growth and physiological characteristics of Sarcandra glabra and Ardisia crenata under different light intensity. J Korea Soc People Plant Environ 19 (2): 85-93. https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2016.19.2.85.

Barcelo RC, Gallao II MGS, Balocnit RG et al (eds). Case Studies in Biocultural Diversity from Southeast Asia. Asia in Transition 19. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6719-0_6.

Bucksch A, Atta-Boateng A, Azihou AF et al. 2017. Morphological plant modeling: Unleashing geometric and topological potential within the plant sciences. Front Plant Sci 8: 900. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00900.

Chua LSL, Sunarti S. 1999. Gaultheria L. In: Oyen LPA, Dung NX (eds.). Prosea No. 19: Essential-Oil Plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.

De Witt TJ, Scheiner SM (eds.). 2004. Phenotypic Plasticity: Functional and Conceptual Approaches. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195138962.001.0001.

Duncan DB. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11 (1): 1-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478.

Erwin DH. 2007. Disparity: Morphological pattern and developmental context. Palaeontology 50 (1): 57-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00614.x.

Gangmei D, Singh T, Sanabam R, Singh N, Devi H. 2024. Morphological characterization of ethnomedicinally important Kaempferia L. (Zingiberaceae) and its present distribution status in Manipur, North-East India. Sci Hortic 333: 112878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2024.112878.

Hauke J, Kossowski T. 2011. Comparison of values of Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients on the same sets of data. Quaest Geogr 30 (2): 87-93. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-011-0021-1.

Hay R, Porter J. 2006. The Physiology of Crop Yield. 2nd ed. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.

Hwang SB, Park S, Jin GR, Jung JH, Park HJ, Lee SH, Shin S, Lee B. 2020. Trends in beverage consumption and related demographic factors and obesity among Korean children and adolescents. Nutrients 12 (9): 2651. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092651.

International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI). 1997. Descriptors for tea (Camellia sinensis). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.

Kiełtyk P, Obidziński A, Scheepens JF. 2025. High-elevation plant species exhibit limited morphological variability across elevations, contrary to species with a wider elevational distribution. Alp Bot 135: 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-025-00340-4.

Landsberg JJ, Sands PJ. 2011. Physiological Ecology of Forest Production: Principles, Processes, and Models. 1st ed. Elsevier/Academic Press, London.

Li Y, Xu Y, Fritsch PW, Lu L. 2023. Patterns of genetic variation and morphology support the recognition of five species in the Gaultheria cumingiana Blume (Ericaceae) group from mainland China. Ecol Evol 13 (6): e10178. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10178.

Lopez-Laphitz RM, Ezcurra C, Vidal-Russell R. 2015. Revisión taxonómica del género sudamericano Quinchamalium (Schoepfiaceae). Bol Soc Argent Bot 50 (2): 235-246. https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.v50.n2.11667. [Spanish]

Mashimbye M, Mudau FN, Soundy P, van Ree T. 2006. A new flavonol from Athrixia phylicoides (bush tea). S Afr J Chem 59: 1-2.

Miller KR, Levine JS. 2002. Prentice Hall Biology. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

Nasungan LM, Garsi JP, Cue EG. 2025. Ethnobotany and cultural significance of wild tea plants in Mountain Province, Philippines. Asian J Ethnobiol 8 (2): 258-270. https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjethnobiol/y080211.

Nasungan LM. 2022. Antioxidant, antibacterial and antiquorum sensing properties of selected wild tea leaves of Mountain Province. J Pure Appl Microbiol 16 (4): 2695-2703. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.16.4.40.

National Mapping and Resource Information Authority (NAMRIA). 2026. Topographic Map: Mountain Province / Bontoc Area (Scale 1:50,000) [Map]. NAMRIA, Taguig. https://isportal.namria.gov.ph/eMapa.

Natural Resource Conservation Service. 1993. Natural Resource Conservation Service, Washington DC. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-11/pH%20-%20Soil%20Health%20Guide_0.pdf

Olejniczak P, Czarnoleski M, Delimat A, Majcher BM, Szczepka K. 2018. Seed size in mountain herbaceous plants changes with elevation in a species-specific manner. PLoS ONE 1 3 (6): e0199224. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199224.

Peakbagger.com. 2026. Mount Amuyao, Philippines. Peakbagger.com, New York. https://www.peakbagger.com/peak.aspx?pid=13131.

Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Diaz S, Garnier E et al. 2013. New handbook for standardized measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 61 (3): 167-234. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT12225.

Ramphinwa ML, Mchau GRA, Mashau ME, Madala NE, Chimonyo VGP, Modi TA, Mabhaudhi T, Thibane VS, Mudau F. 2023. Eco-physiological response of secondary metabolites of teas: Review of quality attributes of herbal tea. Front Sustain Food Syst 7: 990334. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.990334.

Riaz MU, Raza MA, Saeed A, Ahmed M, Hussain T. 2021. Variations in morphological characters and antioxidant potential of different plant parts of four Ziziphus Mill. species from the Cholistan. Plants 10 (12): 2734. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122734.

Sachula G, Zhang YY, Zhao H, Khasbagan. 2020. Wild edible plants collected and consumed by the locals in Daqinggou, Inner Mongolia, China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 16 (1): 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-020-00411-2.

Sardeshpande M, Shackleton C. 2019. Wild edible fruits: A systematic review of an under-researched multifunctional NTFP (non-timber forest product). Forests 10 (6): 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10060467.

Simpson MG. 2010. Plant Systematics. Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374380-0.50001-4.

Thiers BM. 2020. The World’s Herbaria 2020: A Summary Report Based on Data from Index Herbariorum. Issue 5.0 Index Herbariorum. The New York Botanical Garden, New York.

Wambulwa MC, Meegahakumbura MK, Kamunya S, Wachira FN. 2021. From the wild to the cup: Tracking footprints of the tea species in time and space. Front Nutr 8: 706770. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.706770.

Wright IJ, Dong N, Maire V, Prentice IC, Westoby M, Díaz S, Gallagher RV, Jacobs BF, Kooyman R, Law EA, Leishman MR, Niinemets U, Reich PB, Sack L, Villar R, Wang H, Wilf P. 2017. Global climatic drivers of leaf size. Science 357 (6354): 917-921. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4760.

Zar JH. 2010. Biostatistical Analysis. 5th ed. Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River.