Empowering women for biodiversity conservation in Mt. Lantoy Key Biodiversity Area Argao, Cebu, Philippines
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract. Lillo EP, Alcazar SM, Malaki AB, Cutillas AL, Chavez MLM, Abejo Iii MR, Cañarijo Iii DM, Redoblado BR, Margate MA, Diaz JL, Mago JE, Belanizo J, Beceril R, Revillas MJ, Davirao C, Obando ME, Diaz GGG, Gonzaga CF, Cagara BN, Dano VL. 2025. Empowering women for biodiversity conservation in Mt. Lantoy Key Biodiversity Area Argao, Cebu, Philippines. Asian J For 9: 137-143. Women play a vital role in agricultural production and natural resource management. However, they often face barriers that limit their decision-making power and leadership in environmental initiatives. This study investigates the role of gender in biodiversity conservation, focusing on women’s participation, practices, challenges, and perceptions in the Mt. Lantoy Key Biodiversity Area (KBA) in Argao, Cebu, Philippines. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research employed structured surveys, Key Informant Interviews (KIIs), and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with the same respondents to cross-check results. The findings reveal that while women are actively involved in daily resource use such as household provisioning and small-scale farming, only 36.7% have participated in formal conservation activities like tree planting and community cleanups. Societal expectations, including caregiving and household responsibilities, significantly constrain their involvement, alongside a lack of specialized training and limited access to decision-making platforms. Despite these challenges, respondents expressed strong support for women’s leadership in conservation, recognizing its potential to improve ecological outcomes and community resilience. The study emphasizes the need for gender-responsive strategies in local and national policies, such as flexible participation schedules, capacity-building programs, and mechanisms to recognize women’s contributions to conservation. Empowering women through targeted reforms and inclusive governance can enhance biodiversity conservation in the Mt. Lantoy KBA, contributing to goals like food security, climate adaptation, and poverty reduction.
Article Details
Issue
Section
How to Cite
References
REFERENCES
Agarwal B. 2009. Gender and forest conservation: The impact of women's participation in community forest governance. Ecological Economics, 68(11), 2785-2799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.025
Alvarez I, & Lovera S. 2016. New times for women and gender issues in biodiversity conservation and climate justice. Development (2016) 59:263–265. DOI 10.1057/s41301-017-0111-z
Baynes J, Herbohn J, Gregorio N, Unsworth W, Tremblay ÉH. 2019. Equity for Women and Marginalized Groups in Patriarchal Societies during Forest Landscape Restoration: The Controlling Influence of Tradition and Culture. Environmental Conservation. 2019;46(3):241-246. Doi: 10.1017/S0376892919000079
Beede DN, Julian TA, Langdon D, McKittrick G, Khan B, & Doms ME. 2011. Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation. Economics and Statistics Administration Issue Brief, (04-11). DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1964782
Bell SE, & Braun YA. 2010. Coal, identity, and the gendering of environmental justice activism in central Appalachia. Gender & Society, 24(6), 794-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210387277
Ben-Amar W, Chang M, & McIlkenny P. 2017. Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Response to Sustainability Initiatives: Evidence from the Carbon Disclosure Project. J Bus Ethics 142, 369–383 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2759-1
BMB-DENR. 2019. Protection and Conservation Strategy and Action Plan. Retrieved from
http://www.bmb.gov.ph/bmb/CAWED/Proposed_Policy/CMPCSAP_2019-2028.pdf?cv=1.
Bravo F, & Reguera?Alvarado N. 2019. Sustainable development disclosure: Environmental, social, and governance reporting and gender diversity in the audit committee. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 418-429. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2258
Broeckhoven N, & Cliquet A. 2015. Gender and ecological restoration: Time to connect the dots. Restoration Ecology, 23(6), 729-736. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12270
Butler SR. 2013. A Critical Mass of Women on the Board of Directors as Critical Influencers (August 1, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2304828
Carvajal M, Sepúlveda I, Gubler A, Garreaud R. 2022. Worldwide signature of the 2022 Tonga volcanic tsunami. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49(6): e2022GL098153. https://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022gl098153 In: Geophysical Research Letters. American Geophysical Union: Washington. ISSN 0094-8276; e-ISSN 1944-8007
Coleman EA, & Mwangi E. 2013. Women's participation in forest management: A cross-country analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 193-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.005
Cook NJ, Grillos T, & Andersson KP. 2019. Gender quotas increase the equality and effectiveness of climate policy interventions. Nature Climate Change, 9(4), 330-334. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0438-4
Duflo E. 2012. Women empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic literature, 50(4), 1051-1079. DOI: 10.1257/jel.50.4.1051
French Gates M. 2014. Putting women and girls at the center of development. Science, 345(6202), 1273-1275. PMID: 25214610. DOI: 10.1126/science.1258882
Kariuki J, & Birner R. 2016. Are Market-Based Conservation Schemes Gender-Blind? A Qualitative Study of Three Cases from Kenya. Society & Natural Resources, 29(4), 432–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1086461
Lau JD. 2020. Three lessons for gender equity in biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, 34(6), 1589-1591. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13487
Lillo EP, Malaki AB, Alcazar S M T, Nuevo RU, & Rosales R. 2019. Native Trees on Mount Lantoy Key Biodiversity Areas (KBA), Argao, Cebu, Philippines. Philippine Journal of Science, 148(2).
Norgaard K, & York R. 2005. Gender equality and state environmentalism. Gender & Society, 19(4), 506-522. DOI:10.1177/0891243204273612
Pascual U, Phelps J, Garmendia E, Brown K, Corbera E, Martin A & Muradian R. 2014. Social equity matters in payments for ecosystem services. Bioscience, 64(11), 1027-1036. DOI:10.1093/biosci/biu146
Resurreccion BP. 2012. Gender, legitimacy and patronage-driven participation: Fisheries management in the Tonle Sap Great Lake, Cambodia. In Gender and natural resource management (pp. 151-173). Routledge. DOI:10.1080/07900620500482949
Silvestri S, Osano P, Leeuw J D, Herrero M, Ericksen P, Kariuki J, & Notenbaert A. 2012. Greening livestock: Assessing the potential of payment for environmental services in livestock inclusive agricultural production systems in developing countries. ILRI (aka ILCA and ILRAD). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235798656
Sodhi NS, Lee TM, Sekercioglu CH, Webb EL, Prawiradilaga DM, Lohman DJ & Ehrlich PR. 2010. Local people value environmental services provided by forested parks. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 1175-1188. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-009-9745-9
Staples K, & Natcher DC. 2015. Gender, decision making, and natural resource co–management in Yukon. Arctic, 356-366. DOI:10.14430/arctic4506
Taukobong HF, Kincaid MM, Levy JK, Bloom SS, Platt JL, Henry SK, & Darmstadt GL. 2016. Does addressing gender inequalities and empowering women and girls improve health and development programme outcomes? Health policy and planning, 31(10), 1492-1514. DOI:10.1093/heapol/czw074
Van Aelst K, & Holvoet N. 2016. Intersections of gender and marital status in accessing climate change adaptation: Evidence from rural Tanzania. World development, 79, 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.11.003
Yang YE, Passarelli S, Lovell RJ, & Ringler C. 2018. Gendered perspectives of ecosystem services: A systematic review. Ecosystem Services, 31, 58-67. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.018