Ethnobotany and conservation of indigenous edible fruit plants in South Aceh, Indonesia




Abstract. Suwardi AB, Navia ZI, Harmawan T, Syamsuardi, Mukhtar E. 2020. Ethnobotany and conservation of indigenous edible fruit plants in South Aceh, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 21: 1850-1860. The traditional knowledge system is immensely important in the context of plant resource conservation, utilization, and environmental management. The objectives of this study, therefore, were to document local knowledge on the diversity, utilization and sustainable management of indigenous fruit yielding species in the South Aceh region of Indonesia. This research was based on extensive field surveys, plant collection, and interviews with the local people, and a total of 56 indigenous edible fruit species belonging to 24 families were identified. Furthermore, the recognized varieties have numerous applications and serve multiple use categories. For example, they have been adopted as food (56 species), by medicine (16 species), construction materials (14 species), furniture (13 species) and firewood (12 species). These indigenous edible fruits are mostly used in the treatment of cough, stomach ache, diarrhea, fever, and digestive problems, and the following species are commonly traded in traditional markets Durio zibethinus, Garcinia mangostana, Mangifera indica, Mangifera foetida, Mangifera odorata, Baccaurea macrophylla, and Baccaurea lanceolata. The agricultural expansion activities in South Aceh region are assumed to present significant threats to the sustainability of indigenous edible fruit species. Conservation of indigenous fruit plants can be performed through the preservation of traditional knowledge and the promotion and domestication of indigenous fruit plant species.


Abbasi AM, Khan MA, Zafar M. 2013. Ethno-medicinal assessment of some selected wild edible fruits and vegetables of lesser-Himalayas, Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot 45 (SI): 215-222
Alexiades MN, Sheldon JW. 1996. Selected Guidelines for Ethnobotanical Research: A Field Manual. New York: The New York Botanical Garden Press.
Begossi A, Hanazaki N, Tamashiro JY. 2002. Medicinal Plants in the Atlantic Forest (Brazil): Knowledge, Use, and Conservation. Human Ecology 30:281- 299
Bharucha Z, Pretty J. 2010. The roles and values of wild foods in agricultural systems. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365: 2913-2926
Bunawan H, Dusik L. 2013. Botany, Traditional Uses, Phytochemistry and Pharmacology of Archidendron jiringa: A Review. Global Journal of Pharmacology 7 (4): 474-478
Cornara L, La Rocca A, Terrizzano L, Dente F, Mariotti MG. 2014. Ethnobotanical and phytomedical knowledge in the North-Western Ligurian Alps. J Ethnopharmacol 155 (1): 463-84
Cruz-Garcia GS, P.C. Struik, PC. 2015. Spatial and seasonal diversity of wild food plants in home gardens of Northeast Thailand. Economic Botany 69 (2): 99-113
Deb CR, Jamir NS, Ozukum S. 2013. A study on the survey and documentation of Underutilized crops of three district of Nagaland, India. Global Journal of Bioscience 2: 67-70
FAO. 1999. Use and potential of wild plants, Information division and food and agricultural organization of the united nation. Rome, Italy
Francis W. 2005. Uniqueness of Indigenous People. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Gunawan, Chikmawati T, Sobir, Sulistijorini. 2016. Review: Fitokimia genus Baccaurea spp. Bioeksperimen 2(2): 96-110
Handayani T .2018. Diversity, potential and conservation of Annonaceae in Bogor Botanic Gardens, Indonesia. BIODIVERSITAS 19(2): 591-603
Hazarika S, Karpoff JM, Nahata R (2012) Internal corporate governance, CEO turnover, and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics 104

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>