Transformational leadership and field-level accountability in smallholder beef cattle development under environmental uncertainty

Main Article Content

FERDI FATHUROHMAN
TITIK EKOWATI
SIWI GAYATRI
RETNO ADIWINARTI
INA NURTANTI
NEFI ANDRIANA FAJRI
NURUL MUKMINAH
RAHMI RAHMAWATI

Abstract

Abstract. Fathurohman F, Ekowati T, Gayatri S, Adiwinarti R, Nurtanti I, Fajri NA, Mukminah N, Rahmawati R. 2026. Transformational leadership and field-level accountability in smallholder beef cattle development under environmental uncertainty. Asian J Agric 10 (1): g100143. https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjagric/g100143. Accountability within Indonesia’s smallholder beef cattle development program (SIKOMANDAN) is crucial for ensuring national meat security, yet program implementation frequently faces complex field-level challenges such as biological risks and resource instability. This study investigates the institutional determinants of program accountability, focusing on the direct effects of System Integrity (SI), Internal Control Systems (ICS), and Transformational Leadership (TL), alongside the moderating roles of Organizational Commitment (OC) and Environmental Uncertainty (EU). A quantitative survey was conducted using a purposive sampling technique in Subang District, West Java, Indonesia, involving 125 local government officials and agricultural extension workers. Empirical data were evaluated using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) to test both direct and interaction effects. The results show that Transformational Leadership (β = 0.458, p < 0.001) and System Integrity (β = 0.392, p < 0.001) significantly enhance accountability, with the model explaining 76.4% of variance ( = 0.764). In contrast, the Internal Control System has no significant direct effect (β = -0.017, p = 0.814). Organizational Commitment emerges as a significant independent predictor (β = 0.512, p < 0.001) rather than a moderator. Environmental Uncertainty shows no direct effect but indicates a borderline negative effect on internal controls (β = -0.135, p = 0.058). These findings highlight that accountability in livestock governance is driven more by leadership and system integrity than by formal control mechanisms alone. Strengthening adaptive governance through leadership development and flexible operational procedures is essential for program effectiveness in volatile agricultural contexts.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

FATHUROHMAN, F., EKOWATI, T., GAYATRI, S., ADIWINARTI, R., NURTANTI, I., FAJRI, N. A., MUKMINAH, N., & RAHMAWATI, R. (2026). Transformational leadership and field-level accountability in smallholder beef cattle development under environmental uncertainty. Asian Journal of Agriculture, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjagric/g100143

References

Adriani A, Wahyudi H, Siregar I. 2021. Influence the human resource capacity on the performance of agricultural extension officers. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian 26 (2): 101-110. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiip.v26i2.11542. [Indonesian]

Agus A, Widi TSM. 2018. Current situation and prospects for beef cattle production in Indonesia: A review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 31 (7): 976-983. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0233.

Agustine R, Muzayyanah MAU, Putra ARS, Baliarti E. 2023. Utilization of farmer priority on local beef cattle development strategy in Central Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 24 (1): 508-515. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240159.

Allen NJ, Meyer JP. 1990. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. J Occup Psychol 63 (1): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x.

Antwi-Agyei P, Stringer LC. 2021. Improving the effectiveness of agricultural extension services in providing climate change information. Clim Risk Manag 21: 100304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100304.

Avolio BJ, Bass BM. 2004. Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual and Sampler Set. 3rd Edition. Mind Garden, Menlo Park, CA. https://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1602_2.

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). 2025. Subang District in Figures 2025. BPS-Statistics of Subang District, Subang. https://subangkab.bps.go.id. [Indonesian]

Cheng M, McCarl B, Fei C. 2022. Climate change and livestock production: A literature review. Atmosphere 13 (1): 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13010140.

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2013. Internal Control - Integrated Framework. COSO, New York.

Cooper DR, Schindler PS. 2024. Business Research Methods. 12th Edition. Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton.

Davis K, Babu SC, Ragasa C. 2020. Agricultural Extension: Global Status and Performance in Marginalized Areas. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC. https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896293755.

Godde CM, Croz DM, Mayberry DE, Thornton PK, Herrero M. 2021. Impacts of climate change on the livestock food supply chain: A review of the evidence. Glob Food Secur 28: 100488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100488.

Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. 2022. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 3rd Edition. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7.

Handayani D, Yudianto I. 2020. The influence of internal control system, information technology utilization, and organizational commitment on government accountability performance. J Account Audit Bus 3 (2): 17-29. https://doi.org/10.24198/jaab.v3i2.26120.

Hlastwayo PPK, Worth SH. 2019. Agricultural extension: Criteria to determine its visibility and accountability in resource-poor communities. S Afr J Agric Ext 47 (2): 13-23. https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3221/2019/v47n2a499.

Jankelová N, Joniaková Z, Némethová I, Blštáková J. 2020. How to support the effect of transformational leadership on performance in agricultural enterprises. Sustainability 12 (18): 7510. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187510.

Kock N. 2017. Common method bias: A full collinearity assessment method for PLS-SEM. In: Latan H, Noonan R (eds.). Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Basic Concepts, Methodological Issues and Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_11.

Milliken FJ. 1987. Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Acad Manage Rev 12 (1): 133-143. https://doi.org/10.2307/257999.

Nampa IW, Mudita IW, Widinugraheni S. 2025. Managing transboundary banana blood disease through a resilience-based biosecurity framework in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Intl J Trop Drylands 9 (2): 120-134. https://doi.org/10.13057/tropdrylands/t090203.

Putri NF. 2024. Government internal control system in cash expenditure at the livestock service North Lombok Regency. Intl J Econ Manag Account 1 (2): 257-268. https://doi.org/10.61132/ijema.v1i2.88.

Rusdiana S, Soeharsono. 2017. SIWAB program to improve cattle population and economics value for the business economics. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi 35 (2): 125-137. https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v35n2.2017.125-137. [Indonesian]

Triana E, Krisnandi H, Digdowiseiso K. 2024. The influence of transformational leadership, extrinsic work motivation, and work discipline on employee performance agricultural extension and resource development agency (BPPSDMP), ministry of agriculture. J Soc Sci 5 (1): 139-149. https://doi.org/10.46799/jss.v5i1.783.

Uloh CO, Utukubok EM, Sennuga SO. 2025. Influence of leadership styles on job satisfaction among agricultural extension agents in South-South Nigeria. Indian Res J Ext Educ 26 (2): 48-55. https://doi.org/10.54986/irjee/2026/apr_jun/48-55.

Wang J, Guo H, Jiang Q, Zhao Z. 2024. Internal control significantly improves the corporate social responsibility performance of listed companies in the agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery sectors: Empirical evidence from China. Isr J Aquac 77 (3): 213-221. https://doi.org/10.46989/001c.143798.

Zhang J, Zhang Y, Tong Z, Yin G, Zhang L, Liu S, Geng L, Lyu J. 2025. Financial flexibility and firm performance in Chinese livestock-listed enterprises: The mediating role of financing constraints and the moderating role of environmental uncertainty. Front Sustain Food Syst 9: 1714193. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1714193.