Economic and technological drivers of rural youth engagement in sugar palm agro-industry in South Sulawesi, Indonesia
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract. Ernawati, Syahidah, Mujetahid A. 2026. Economic and technological drivers of rural youth engagement in sugar palm agro-industry in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Asian J Agric 10 (1): g100158. https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjagric/g100158. Palm sugar derived from sugar palm (Arenga pinnata) supports rural livelihoods in Indonesia, yet declining youth participation may weaken enterprise regeneration. Youth refer to individuals aged 15-30 years. This study examined how social, economic, and technical (technological capital) factors, as well as environmental factors, are associated with youth involvement in the sugar-palm agroindustry in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. A census-based survey was conducted in Rompegading and Limapoccoe Villages (Maros District) with 51 respondents aged ≥15 years who were already engaged in tapping, processing, or marketing; interpretation emphasizes the youth subgroup where relevant. Indicators were measured using a three-point Likert scale and aggregated into composite indices for each factor and youth involvement. Multiple linear regression was used to assess associations between the factor indices and youth involvement. Technical (technological capital) and economic factors were positively associated with youth involvement, while social and environmental factors were not statistically significant. Findings suggest that youth engagement may be strengthened through practical training, safer and more efficient tools and processing practices, and measures that enhance income predictability and market access. Because the study is cross-sectional and site-specific, the findings should be interpreted as associative; broader, multi-site, and longitudinal studies are recommended to verify and extend these insights.
Article Details
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Arifianto DS, Awaliyah F, Adinasa MN. 2024. Economic efficiency of palm sugar enterprises and factors affecting their income in Garut Regency. Mahatani: J Agribisnis 7 (2): 286-306. https://doi.org/10.52434/mja.v7i2.41946. [Indonesian].
Aybek EC, Toraman C. 2022. How many response categories are sufficient for Likert-type scales? An empirical study based on item response theory. Intl J Assess Tools Educ 9 (2): 534-547. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1132931.
Bhagat RB. 2020. Migration Theories: A Critical Evaluation and Synthesis. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14713.90722.
Cochran WG. 1977. Sampling Techniques. 3rd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Destiana, Albinasari D, Hardiansyah G. 2023. Utilization of sugar palm sap as raw material for palm sugar production as a source of community income in Kumpang Tengah Village, Landak Regency. J Hutan Lestari 11 (2): 541-551. [Indonesian]
Dlamini SI, Huang WC, Masuku MB. 2022. Factors affecting youth participation in agriculture: Evidence from Eswatini. Sustainability 14 (13): 7859. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137859.
Duffy C, Toth GG, O’Hagan RP, McKeown PC, Rahman SA, Widyaningsih Y, Sunderland TCH, Spillane C. 2021. Agroforestry contributions to smallholder farmer food security in Indonesia. Agrofor Syst 95 (6): 1109-1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00632-8.
Effendy L, Maryani A, Azie AY. 2020. Factors affecting rural youth interest in agriculture in Sindangkasih Ciamis District. J Penyuluhan 16 (2): 277-288. https://doi.org/10.25015/16202030742.
Fuady I, Andriani Y, Sutarjo MAS. 2023. The validity and reliability of the instrument planned behavior theory in measuring students' intentions to engage in agricultural entrepreneurship. Agrisocionomics 7 (2): 300-311. https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v7i2.16637.
Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. 2004. Diffusion of innovations in service organisations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 82 (4): 581-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x.
Harahap DE, Kuswardani RA, Rauf A. 2025. Leaves as an indicator of potential production of palm sap in sugar palm (Arenga pinnata Merr.) in South Tapanuli Regency. Juatika: Jurnal Agronomi Tanaman Tropika 7 (2): 10-13. https://doi.org/10.36378/juatika.v7i2.4295.
Hasbia, Firdamayanti E. 2023. Development of palm sugar (ant sugar) agro-industry in West Suli District. Wanatani 3 (1): 37-51. https://doi.org/10.51574/jip.v3i1.156.
Iba Z, Wardhana A. 2024. Regression and Path Analysis for Business Research using SPSS 29.0 and SMART-PLS 4.0. CV Eureka Media Aksara, Purbalingga, Central Java, Indonesia. [Indonesian]
Lee ES. 1966. A theory of migration. Demography 3 (1): 47-57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2060063.
Lillo EP, Diaz GGG, Diaz JLB, Mago JE, Davirao CR. 2025. Socio-demographic profile of food farmers in Carcar City, Cebu, Philippines amid challenges and opportunities for agricultural development. Asian J Agric 9 (1): 240-246. https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjagric/g090124.
Lohr SL. 2019. Sampling: Design and Analysis. 2nd Edition. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429296284.
Makarennu, Sabar A, Yumeina D, Nipi GE, Magfira W, Nurhidayah R, Pasau T. 2023. Value chain analysis of palm sugar enterprises in Cenrana District, Maros Regency. J Hutan dan Masyarakat 15 (2): 107-117. https://doi.org/10.24259/jhm.v12i2.32048. [Indonesian]
Montesclaros JML, Teng PS. 2023. Digital technology adoption and potential in Southeast Asian agriculture. Asian J Agric Dev 20 (2): 7-30. https://doi.org/10.37801/ajad2023.20.2.2.
Mujetahid A, Muin AVF, Wulan S. 2023. Potential of sugar palm (Arenga pinnata) in KHDTK Hasanuddin University Educational Forest, Rompegading Village, Cenrana District, Maros Regency. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 1277 (1): 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1277/1/012013.
Nguyen MP, Pagella T, Catacutan DC, Nguyen TQ, Sinclair F. 2021. Adoption of agroforestry in Northwest Viet Nam: Roles of social and cultural norms. Forests 12 (4): 493. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040493.
Ningsih F, Syaf S. 2015. Determine factors of rural youth involvement on sustainable agriculture activities. J Penyuluhan 11 (1): 23-37. https://doi.org/10.25015/penyuluhan.v11i1.9929.
Obon AM, Balila JS, Balila EA. 2025. Factor analysis of research culture: A comparative study of 3-point and 5-point Likert scales. Intl J Health Sci 9 (1): 26-51. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v9n1.15375.
Republic of Indonesia. 2009. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 40 of 2009 concerning Youth. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2009 Number 148. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id. [Indonesian]
Ruhkmauddin L, Hanani N, Riana FD. 2024. Intentions and behavior of the youth to work in the agricultural sector. J Tek Pert Lampung 14 (3): 1022-1033. https://doi.org/10.23960/jtep-l.v14i3.1022-1033.
Scoones I. 1998. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis. IDS Working Paper 72: 1-22.
Withaningsih S, Parikesit, Nurislamidini H. 2021. Management strategies for palm sugar (Arenga pinnata) production on extreme landscapes of Rongga, West Bandung Regency. Intl J Conserv Sci 12 (2): 625-640.
Yami M, Feleke S, Abdoulaye T, Alene A, Bamba Z, Manyong V. 2019. African rural youth engagement in agribusiness: Achievements, limitations, and lessons. Sustainability 11 (1): 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010185.
Yani R, Alam AS. 2024. Income analysis of palm sugar enterprises in Tuwa Village, Gumbasa District, Sigi Regency. ULIN Jurnal Hutan Tropis 8 (1): 225-233. https://doi.org/10.32522/ujht.v8i1.1486. [Indonesian]
Zahra FA, Ariyanti M. 2025. Growth response of immature sugar palm (Arenga pinnata Merr.) aged four years to the application of single and compound fertilizer dosage variations. J Agro Industri Perkebunan 13 (1): 67-76. https://doi.org/10.25181/jaip.v13i1.3995. [Indonesian]
Zano BR, Santoso T. 2019. Analysis of the effects of product quality, price, and advertising on Yamaha motorcycle purchasing decisions in PT Surya Timur Sakti Jatim Surabaya. Agora 7 (1): 48-60. [Indonesian]